How the UN “Swiss paradox” was resolved

by Armando Mombelli,

On March 3, 2002, the Swiss population narrowly voted to join the United Nations – a historic decision.

It came after more than half a century of refusing to be part of the body, out of fears linked above all to safeguarding Switzerland’s cherished neutrality.

“The Swiss have arrived. We have waited a long time,” said the then UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, as he welcomed the Swiss delegation ten years ago.

Switzerland’s decision not to join the UN had been viewed with incomprehension by the rest of the world. How come a country which had actively participated in the League of Nations before the Second World War and which hosted many parts of the UN afterwards, didn’t want to join?

To fully understand this “Swiss paradox” requires a step back in history – to June 26, 1945 when 51 countries signed the UN Charter in San Francisco.

Switzerland felt disappointed by the failure of the League of Nations and viewed its successor, the UN, as a kind of “winners’ club”. Let the big powers get on with it and then we’ll see, was the prevailing opinion of the time.

Neutrality question

The main reason was, however, linked to the concept of neutrality which had been carefully nurtured by the authorities in Switzerland.

When it joined the League of Nations in 1920, the Swiss government opted for a differentiated view of neutrality – the country remained politically neutral but could participate in economic sanctions. But, in 1938, as the threat of war grew, it returned to complete neutrality.

“This vision of complete or absolute neutrality became mythologised during and after the Second World War. People thought, or pretended to think, that it was above all neutrality which had saved the country from conflict,” said Zurich University historian Carlo Moos.

“This was spread for propaganda reasons across the country, but was also to defend Switzerland from attacks from abroad.”

read more here:

2 replies

  1. My very personal view:

    Not only would I have voted against Switzerland joining the United Nations. I would urge all Arab and Islamic nations (and all ‘Third World Countries’ – in fact all the countries without a permanent seat at the UN Security Council) to leave the United Nations. The UN is the most undemocratic institution.

    I would also urge all UN ‘organizations’ such as the World Health Organization, the World Food Program etc. to leave the United Nations also. They are just being ‘mis-used’ by the political body, the UN security council. A little ‘Health Aid’ and ‘Food Aid’ is being thrown around, so that in the meantime the Security Council can go ahead with its undemocratic decisions.

    On top of that even the best UN organizations are not cost efficient. Any international NGO could do the same work at half the bureaucratic cost of a UN agency.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.