The New World Order of Islam (7): Unsuitability of Judaism

The below text examines the suitability of Judaism as an ideological basis for a New World Order. It does not mean to reflect the actual religious practice of all Jewish people. As the fourth Ahmadiyya Caliph has said, in his book ‘The Gulf Crisis and the New World Order’ on page 226:‘… all Jews are not alike because there are some gentle-natured and noble-minded Jews who are very much opposed to the creation of Israel as a separate state and reject its policies which they regard as harmful, not only for mankind but also for the Jews themselves. So when I say Jews, it certainly does not imply that I condemn the Jewish community collectively, but by Jews I always mean the state of Israel’.Also, the Quran always makes distinction between righteous and unrighteous practice of Judaism (Quran 3:113-114). There is the danger that by taking Jewish religious texts out of their practical context, we will make the same offence so many have made against Islam by taking its texts out of context. The Rabbis above, from, represent an example of Jews who exert themselves in righteousness.

Mahmud Ahmad: Judaism will not produce a righteous world order

I have so far dealt with purely secular movements. I now come to the schemes put forward by the followers of different religions for setting up a new order. Of these religions the principal ones are Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The followers of each of these faiths claim superiority for their particular faith, and allege that by following its teachings the world can get rid of all pain and tribulation. For this purpose I shall start with Judaism.

Judaism has a racial attitude towards religion
The system advocated by Judaism is purely racial. There is nothing universal in it. For instance, Judaism teaches that the descendants of Israel alone are the chosen of God, and that the rest of mankind were created to serve them. If followers of the religion obtain a position of domination in the world, tyranny is bound to increase rather than decline.

Judaism allows taking interest from gentiles
Again, Judaism forbids a Jew lending to another Jew on interest (Deut. 23: 19-20; Lev. 25: 35-37), but leaves him at liberty to lend on usury to others. Now, if the lending of money on interest is evil, why is this evil prohibited when the debtor is a Jew and permitted in the case of a Gentile debtor? The reason is that Judaism is a purely racial faith and permits in the case of Gentiles what it does not countenance in the case of Jews. If this faith were to prevail, it is obvious that it will impose levies upon Gentiles and distribute the proceeds thereof among the Jews.

Charity is restricted to fellow-Jews
Similarly, Judaism encourages the spending of money for the relief of poverty and other charitable purposes, but restricts its application to the Jews alone. Under the Jewish Government, therefore, the benefit of all such expenditure will go to the Jews alone.

Slavery is allowed for gentiles
Again, Judaism does not prohibit slavery, though it prohibits a Jew being made a slave permanently. That is to say, a Jew should not ordinarily be reduced to the position of a slave, but if he should happen to be one, this should only be temporary. This is secured by the ordinance that all Jewish slaves should be set at liberty every seventh year, (Deut. 15:12; Exod. 21: 2). (…) That is to say, the maximum period during which a Jew can remain in slavery is seven years. The rest of mankind may be reduced to perpetual slavery, but with this Judaism has no concern.

Harsh rules of war
Judaism also lays down very harsh conditions which must be imposed upon nations opposed to it.

When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee and they shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it. And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations (Deut. 20:10-15).

This is with regard to foreign countries. With regard to the land of Canaan which was the promised land, the injunction is still more stringent. But of the cities of these people which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth (Deut. 20:16).

Conclusion: Judaism will not produce a righteous order
This is the social and economic system prescribed by Judaism. If Judaism were to prevail, every male Gentile would be put to the sword and their women and children reduced to slavery. Not only Christian men, women and children resident in the land of Canaan but even horses, donkeys, dogs, cats, snakes, and lizards in the land must all be killed. For, the injunction is to kill everything that breathes. Under this system the Jews may obtain some relief, but other nations will be utterly destroyed.

Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad, The New World Order of Islam (1942), Islam International Publications, Tilford UK 2005 (pdf); p. 48-52. Subheadings by Spiritual Change.

1 reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.