SaudiArabia has said, over and over again, that its religious and moral duty behooves it to take the stand it has adopted today against the Assad regime, and this is in order to protect the unarmed Syrians, and to protect Syria itself from who knows what awaits it, in light of Assad’s brutal repression.
Last week, the Saudi king told the Russian president that he has religious and moral standards, as does his country, toward what is happening in Syria. The day before yesterday, the Saudi ministerial Cabinet, chaired by Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah, reiterated that “that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will be at the forefront of any international effort aiming to achieve urgent, comprehensive and effective solutions to protect the Syrian people.” As a result (of this proactive Saudi stance), there are now those who ask why Saudi Arabia did not try to convince Assad himself in the past, and others, from among the Assad regime’s affiliates, who now seek to slander and defame the Kingdom at every opportunity, such as the tyrant of Damascus’ ambassador to the United Nations, while others now say that Saudi Arabia is simply trying to lecture them on democracy.
Is Saudi Arabia really dictating its conditions to the tyrant of Damascus, and stipulating specific steps? Is the Kingdom really adopting this crucial position now, without ever trying to exert peaceful efforts upon Assad in the past? To answer these questions we must consider the following story, and consider the difference in terms of wisdom, credibility and nobility between those who offer genuine advice, and those who kill in order to stay in power!
At the beginning of the revolution, Bashar Assad contacted Saudi Arabia saying that matters were getting worse in Syria, no one was standing by him, and he was facing financial difficulties and so on. At the time, Assad said that he felt abandoned by everyone, and asked for advice, saying that he was ready to respond to whatever he needed to hear, and what would be asked of him.
However, Bashar Assad’s phone call, the subject of our conversation, took place at the same time as the Syrian regime’s media was accusing Saudi princes of standing behind the Syrian revolution, and claiming that the revolution was a Wahhabi conspiracy. The Saudi response to Assad was as follows: We don’t want to do anything at all, the Syrian problem lies within Syria, and within your hands specifically. All we ask is that you stop the killings. Do not kill. Hence the advice we give you is simply: Go out and address the Syrians, make your speech brief, no more than 10 minutes, and give them more than they are asking for. Grant them more than the demands they have come out to protest for, and then you will have saved Syria and answered your people.
read more here:
http://arabnews.com/opinion/columns/article581048.ece
Categories: Asia, Saudi Arabia, Syria
Unfortunately there is a ‘hidden agenda’ in this case and the ‘hidden agenda’ in this case is Iran and the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Syria is a close ally of Iran and consequently ‘the friend of my enemy is my enemy’.
Would it not be nice if Saudi Arabia was truly ‘impartial’ in this conflict? After all as custodian of the two holy mosques for the matters of Hajj Saudi Arabia does manage to deal with Iran in a impartial manner. Why not extend this ‘impartiality’ to matters of Syrian politics also?
The other issue is installing a tame Brotherhood/Salafi rule funded by Saudi that will play nice with America and Israel. Everyone should then pretend to be frightened by Iranian nukes that don’t exist while ignoring 400 Zionist ones.