Source: NY Times.
A writer for a Times blog about philosophy argues that being an atheist does not mean “anything goes” — in fact, quite the opposite. What do you think? Can morality be independent of God? Can people who don’t believe in God still be as “good” as those who do? What governs your own decisions about whether and how to act ethically?
In “Good Minus God,” Louise M. Antony writes:
I gather that many people believe that atheism implies nihilism — that rejecting God means rejecting morality. A person who denies God, they reason, must be, if not actively evil, at least indifferent to considerations of right and wrong…
… It is only if morality is independent of God that we can make moral sense out of religious worship. It is only if morality is independent of God that any person can have a moral basis for adhering to God’s commands. Let me explain why. First let’s take a cold hard look at the consequences of pinning morality to the existence of God. Consider the following moral judgments — judgments that seem to me to be obviously true:
Foundation of our morality: Islamic and Judeo-Christian tradition
If we examine our morality in its extreme situations we may realize that clearly there are religious implications and our morality came from God and perhaps cannot fully exist without God.
Our morality is rooted in the prophets of God who revealed to us the absolute standards of our Creator against murder and incest for example.
If we carefully examine the teachings of the Bible and the Holy Quran on the subject of murder and incest we will find Quranic tradition a more evolved and preserved text. The Holy Quran details the blood relationships that believers are forbade to marry. It says:
About murder the Quran links itself to the Jewish tradition and states:
Read further and watch a few debates on the theme:
http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/foundation-of-our-morality-islamic-and-judeo-christian-tradition