Sloth: A Christian Perspective

By Paul Kokoski

“I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew you out of my mouth”(Revelation 3:15-16).

Sloth, often called acedia, is often described simply as the sin of laziness. However, while this is part of the manifestation of sloth, the central problem with sloth as a capital sin is spiritual laziness – which leads to lukewarmness.

Sloth is connected with sensuality. It proceeds from a love of pleasure, inasmuch as it inclines us to avoid effort and hardship. There is in all of us a tendency to follow the line of least resistance, which paralyses or lessens our activity.

Sloth is an inclination to idleness or at least to aimlessness, to apathy in action. At times this is a morbid disposition due to poor condition of health. More frequently it is a disease of the will, which fears effort and recoils from it. The slothful person wants to escape all exertion, whatever might interfere with their comfort or involve fatigue. Like the real parasite, they live on others to whatever extent they can, becoming gruff and ill-tempered when one tries to rouse them from their inaction.

There are various degrees of sloth. The indolent person takes up his task reluctantly, and indifferently; what he does, he does badly. The sluggard does not absolutely refuse to work, but he delays and postpones indefinitely the accepted task. The truly lazy person wants to do nothing that proves irksome and shows a distinct aversion to all real work, whether physical or mental. The idea of right living inspires in him not joy but disgust, because of its laboriousness.

When sloth is related to spiritual exercises it is called spiritual sloth. This consists in a certain dislike for things spiritual, which tends to make us negligent in the performance of our exercises of piety ( prayer, the sacraments etc.), causes us to shorten them or to omit them altogether for vain excuses.

In order to understand the malice of sloth we have to remember that man was made to work. When God created Adam and Eve he placed them in the garden Eden “to cultivate and care for it” (Gen. 2:15). This is because man is not a perfect being, having many faculties which must act in order to be perfected. Hence, it is a necessity of man’’s nature that he should labour to cultivate his powers, to provide for his spiritual and physical wants and thus tend towards his heavenly goal. The law of work, therefore, precedes original sin. But because man sinned, work has become for him not merely a law of nature, but also a punishment, in the sense that work has become burdensome and a means of repairing sin: it is in the sweat of our face that we must get our bread to eat, the food of the mind as well as the body (Gen. 3: 19).

The slothful man sins more or less grievously according to the obligations and duties he neglects. When he shuns matters of importance in regards to his duties of state, or goes so far as to neglect religious duties necessary to his salvation or sanctification, he commits a grievous fault. A venial sin is committed when he fails in civil or religious duties of lesser moment.

Because of its harmful consequences, spiritual sloth constitutes one of the most serious obstacles to perfection. This is because it makes life more or less barren:

” I passed by the field of the slothful man,

by the vineyard of the man without sense;

And behold! It was all overgrown with thistles;

its surface was covered with nettles,

and its stone wall broken down.

And as I gazed at it, I reflected;

I saw and learned the lesson:

A little sleep, a little slumber,

a little folding of the arms to rest –

Then will poverty come upon you like a highwayman,

and want like an armed man” (Prov 24: 30-34).

Indeed. This is what one finds in the soul of the slothful man. Where there should be virtues and charity one finds vices alongside crumbling walls which mortification had raised to protect virtue. As a result, temptation soon becomes more persistent and assailing: “For idleness has taught much evil” (Sirach: 33: 29). It was idleness and pride that destroyed Sodom (Ezech. 16: 49).

Man’’s heart and mind cannot for long remain inactive. Unless they are engaged by study or other work they are soon filled with a host of fancies, thoughts, desires and emotions. Because of our fallen nature sensual, ambitious, proud and selfish thoughts then gain the upper hand exposing us to sin. St. Thomas tells us that, in addition to drinking, carousing, gambling and taking up with bad company sloth can eventually lead to despair since “sloth is a real sadness that casts the spirit down.”

What is ultimately at stake is our eternal salvation. Apart from the sins into which idleness causes us to fall, the mere fact of failing to fulfil important duties incumbent on us is sufficient cause for reprobation. The barren tree, by the mere fact that it bears no fruit, deserves to be cut down and thrown into the fire: “Every tree therefore that doth not yield good fruit, shall be cut down and cast into the fire. (Matt. 3: 10).

To remedy sloth we need first of all to form in ourselves strong convictions concerning the necessity of work; to make ourselves understand that both the rich and the poor come under this law, and that its infringement may involve eternal damnation. This is the lesson given by Our Lord in His parable of the barren fig tree.

If a person is rich and not obliged to work for himself, he must do so for others. And indeed the opportunities are not lacking: how many poor need help, how many ignorant need instruction, how many broken hearts need mending, how many families need rearing to ensure, among other things, that the future of the children will be safeguarded!

Alongside convictions we also need to make sustained and intelligent efforts to train and strengthen the will. Since the slothful man instinctively shrinks from effort it is important to keep in mind that there is no one more wretched than the idle man. Not knowing how to manage his time, the idle man soon becomes a burden to himself and ultimately he becomes wearied of life itself. Is it not preferable to engage in useful work and secure some real contentment by striving to make those around us happy?

Among the slothful there are those who do expend a certain amount of excess activity at play, sports and worldly gatherings. These must be reminded of the serious side of life and that they should turn such activities into more useful and worthier fields of action. Christian marriage with its immediate obligations and duties often proves an excellent remedy for sloth. Parents realize the necessity of working for their offspring and the inadvisability of entrusting to strangers the care of their interests. What we must constantly bear in mind is the end of life: we are here on earth in order to attain, through work and virtue, a place in heaven. God is ever addressing to us: “Why stand you here all the day idle…Go you also into the vineyard” (Matt. 20: 6-7).

Categories: Americas

5 replies

  1. I am thankful to Paul Kokoski for his submissions as those become an opportunity to highlight what is common in our two traditions.

    His articles and subsequent discussion in the comment section also provides an opportunity to show the differences between Christianity and Islam. Whereas, Paul Kokoski’s article brings out emphasis on good works, in many of letters of St. Paul we see an obsession with faith, which is not seen in the Gospel of Matthews and Book of James:

    What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

    But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”

    Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.

    You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend. You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone.

    In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead. (James 2:14-26)

    The Holy Quran lays stress on both the right belief and right actions and highlights that both feed into each other and go hand in hand as is mentioned in a short chapter, Sura Asr:

    In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. By the fleeting Time. Surely, man is in a state of loss, Except those who believe and do good works, and exhort one another to accept truth, and exhort one another to be steadfast. (Al Quran 103:1-4)

    Christianity has an obsession with faith as opposed to good works. In Protestant faith there is a basic tenet called Sola Gracia. Here are details from Wikipedia:

    Sola gratia is one of the five solas propounded to summarise the Reformers’ basic beliefs during the Protestant Reformation; it is a Latin term meaning grace alone. Protestant reformers believed that this emphasis was in contradistinction to the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, though the Catholic Church had explicitly affirmed the doctrine of sola gratia in the year 529 in the Council of Orange, which condemned the Pelagian heresy.[1] As a response to this misunderstanding, Catholic doctrine was further clarified in the Council of Trent– the Council explained that salvation is made possible only by grace; the faith and works of men are secondary means that have their origins in and are sustained by grace.

    During the Reformation, Protestant leaders and theologians generally believed the Roman Catholic view of the means of salvation to be a mixture of reliance upon the grace of God, and confidence in the merits of one’s own works performed in love, pejoratively called Legalism. The Reformers posited that salvation is entirely comprehended in God’s gifts (that is, God’s act of free grace), dispensed by the Holy Spirit according to the redemptive work of Jesus Christ alone.

    Consequently, they argued that a sinner is not accepted by God on account of the change wrought in the believer by God’s grace, and indeed, that the believer is accepted without any regard for the merit of his works—for no one deserves salvation, a concept that some take to the extreme of Antinomianism, a doctrine that argues that if someone is saved, he/she has no need to live a holy life, given that salvation is already “in the bag”.

    Sola gratia is one of the Protestant Reformation’s Five Solas and is also linked to the five points of Calvinism.

    Read about Sola Fide, by faith alone also.

  2. Dear Zia,

    People should know that Christianity is represented by Catholicism. Protestantism is a collection of thousands of break-away sects that rejected the Catholic Church and Jesus Christ to follow Martin Luther, King Henry VII etc.
    Now it is incorrect to say that “Christianity has an obsession with faith as opposed to good works.” This is true of Protestantism but not Christianity (Catholicism) which explicitly teaches that faith and good works go hand in hand as you quotes above. Please refrain from lumping the Catholic Church in with all other sects that claim to be Christian.

  3. Dear Paul,

    Thank you for your comment and highlighting the difference between Catholicism and Protestantism, in regards to Sola Fide. Please, also tell us from your perspective, did Jesus die on the cross for our sins or not?

    Thanks

  4. So, Jesus died for our sins, past, present and future. Never mind our actions! We just need to believe that he died for us, according to the Christian dogma, as I can best understand it.

    It seems to me that Protestants are being more precise about their beliefs and perhaps, Catholics want to have their cake and eat it too!

    Don’t you think?

    If you will insist, I will need to revisit, Council of Orange, the Pelagian heresy and the Council of Trent.

Leave a Reply to Paul KokoskiCancel reply