Lawmakers must rise above politics and craft sensible gun-control laws

By: M. Imran Hayee, Duluth News Tribune

Three months after the shocking Newtown tragedy, America’s top lawmakers remain unable to take action on gun-control legislation. Instead, a fierce fight between President Obama and the gun lobby is on the rise.

The gun lobby portrays Obama as an elite hypocrite who wants to abolish the Second Amendment by taking away Americans’ right to self-defense.

Since the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791, the Supreme Court officially interpreted the Second Amendment only once, in June 2008, when it overturned Washington, D.C.’s 32-year-old ban on handguns with a 5-4 vote. A narrow margin but a big win for the gun lobby. Sympathizing with Washington’s problems with crime and guns, Justice Atnonin Scalia wrote in the majority statement, “The Constitution leaves the District of Columbia a variety of tools for combating that problem, including some measures regulating handguns.”

Although the historic Supreme Court verdict kept the doors open for future gun regulation, it came just a few months before Obama started his first term. Whether influenced by this or not, Obama’s entire first-term record on gun control consisted of signing a bill that made it easier to carry firearms in America’s national parks.

However, on Jan. 16, moved by the Newtown tragedy, Obama signed 23 executive orders to prevent future gun violence, and he proposed significant gun-control legislation, including an assault-weapons ban, limits on high-capacity magazines and universal background checks.

According to a recent CNN poll, 62 percent of Americans favor an assault-weapons ban and limits on high-capacity magazines. A similar Pew poll found that 85 percent of Americans back a universal background check. In spite of overwhelming public support, the president’s proposal is unlikely to pass the House.

The gun lobby vehemently opposes the president’s proposal, claiming that most mass shooters have preferred handguns over assault weapons and didn’t have criminal records to suggest the proposed legislation could work.

Defending his proposal, the president has responded, “If there is even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.” Read futher

Categories: Americas, United States

1 reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.