Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up? William Lane Craig vs. John Dominic Crossan

Additional Reading and viewing

Jesus did not die on the cross!

Was Jesus Crucified? Ahmed Deedat vs Dr. Floyd E. Clark

Gospel story of Jesus’ resurrection a source of deep rifts in Christian religion

The pagan roots of Easter

Dan Barker’s Challenge to Every Christian about Resurrection and Ascension

If Jesus did not die upon the cross: A study in evidence

The Last Supper: A Fiction Opposing the Account of Garden of Gethsemane

The Pope Benedict’s account of resurrection and the hearsay rule!

Did Jesus rise in a physical body or a spiritual one?

65 Reasons to Believe Jesus Did Not Die on the Cross

Pastors Ordained by God to Demystify Christianity

1 reply

  1. Taking Jesus to be a noble prophet of God, makes Muslim’s position so much simpler and rational and saves us from so many unnecessary debates and arguments.

    It may seem that John Dominic Crossan appeared vulnerable during the 40 minutes of conversation, in this debate, but, he was pitched against two people at the same time. The moderator was also a conservative Christian. He would have done better if he had considered physical resuscitation as the real possibility rather than an ambiguous and metaphorical explanation for resurrection.

    At any rate, I think real loser in this debate was Prof. William Lane Craig, as he was going against naturalism, which has been clearly established by the last five hundred year history of scientific tradition. Craig seems to suggest that miracles violate the laws of nature and their cannot be be a claim in this age of enlightenment, more absurd than this.

    For additional details read:

    Religion and Science: The Indispensable God-hypothesis

Leave a Reply