First a few words about the big picture. Atheists are right in exposing the irrationality of the Christian dogma. However, the Christians are right in as far as their claim that there needs to be a Creator of this universe, Who employed natural means to do His work. However, both parties in their self-conceit are not listening to how Islam resolves their conflict; Islam as understood by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.
The agnostics and atheists learn about the vulnerabilities of the Bible and without genuinely studying the case for the Holy Quran attribute the vulnerabilities to the Quran also. In this post some details about the Bible are linked.
For a genuine comparison of the Bible and the Holy Quran see some of my comments in this post.
The Title of this post is a book by the Founding President of one of the top USA universities, the Cornell University, Andrew Dickson White.
Andrew Dickson White
Because the suppression of scientific thought by the medieval Church represents one of blackest periods of human history, many scholars have studied this period with great care. Worth special mention is a remarkable two-volume treatise by Andrew Dickson White entitled A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, published in 1896. The whole text of the two volumes of the book can be read on www.archive.org. Here is one example:
The doctrine of the spherical shape of the earth, and therefore the existence of the antipodes, was bitterly attacked by theologians who asked: ‘Is there anyone so senseless as to believe that crops and trees grow downwards? . . . that the rains and snow fall upwards?’ The great authority of St Augustine held the Church firmly against the idea of the antipodes and for a thousand years it was believed that there could not be human beings on the opposite side of the earth – even if the earth had opposite sides. In the sixth century, Procopius of Gaza brought powerful theological guns to bear on the issue: there could not be an opposite side, he declared, because for that Christ would have had to go there and suffer a second time. Also, there would have had to exist a duplicate Eden, Adam, Serpent, and Deluge. But that being clearly wrong, there could not be any antipodes. QED!
The Intelligent Design movement, the Evolution wars in USA and efforts during the intrusive reign of President Zia ul Haq in Pakistan are prime examples of futile struggle between religion and science. There is a popular saying, “Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” In that spirit it would be worthwhile to read this book.
To review additional fascinating accounts in this compendium first go to this link:
The book is available on the web and the best things in life are free:
Categories: Book Reviews, CHRISTIANITY, Religion & Science
Recruiting the four Horsemen of Neo-atheism into Cavalry of Islam:
Allopathic Medicine’s long struggle with the Bible
The Holy Quran as the Miracle of the Holy Prophet
The Bible, The Quran and Science: Is the Quran copied from the Bible?
Islam and Science – Religious orthodoxy and battle for rationality
ISLAM AND SCIENCE – CONCORDANCE OR CONFLICT?
Science and Monotheism
February 2011 Alislam-eGazette: Metaphysics, Religion and Science