Austria seeks to criminalise ‘political Islam’ as it unveils broad new anti-terror measures

Proposals include life sentences for those convicted of terror offences and criminalising political activity that encourages ‘extremism’

The departure of Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s far-right ministers prompted the collapse of his coalition government

Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz says measures target both terror suspects and ideology that drives them (AFP/File photo)

By MEE and agencies
Published date: 11 November 2020

Austria plans to introduce a series of anti-terrorism measures following last week’s deadly attack in Vienna, including the criminalisation of political interpretations of Islam that are deemed to encourage violent extremism.

Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said on Wednesday that the measures were intended to protect society from extremists he described as “ticking time bombs”.

The proposals include the ability to keep individuals convicted of terror offences behind bars for life, facilitate electronic surveillance of people convicted of terror-related offences upon release, and criminalise political activity that encourages violence.

Kurz said the measures, which will be brought to a vote in parliament in December, take a two-pronged approach, targeting both terror suspects and the ideology that drives them.

“We will create a criminal offence called ‘political Islam’ in order to be able to take action against those who are not terrorists themselves, but who create the breeding ground for them,” Kurz tweeted after the meeting.

He also said the government planned to simplify the process of shutting down associations or mosques deemed to play a role in radicalisation, and to enable the public to report potential “jihadist” activities on an online platform.

A central register of imams will also be created.

Also among the measures is a proposal that would make it possible for authorities to strip people of Austrian citizenship if they are convicted of terror-related offences.

Vice-Chancellor Werner Kogler, who leads the junior coalition party, the Greens, said the new measures would apply to “all forms of terror”, including “terror by neo-Nazis”.

Homes and businesses raided

On Monday, almost 1,000 police and intelligence service officers raided homes, businesses and associations allegedly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, seizing millions of euros in cash across four provinces.

Prosecutors insisted the raids were not connected to the attack last week, but were the result of an investigation stretching back more than a year.

Four people were killed and 22 wounded when Kujtim Fejzulai, described as a 20-year-old Islamic State sympathiser, opened fire with a Kalashnikov in a busy area of the Austrian capital the night before the country went into a new Covid-19 lockdown.

A dual Austrian and Macedonian national, Fejzulai had been convicted of a terror offence in April last year for trying to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State group.

An investigation has been launched into why Austria didn’t have Fejzulai under observation despite being tipped off by Slovakian authorities that in July he had tried to purchase ammunition at a shop in the Slovakian capital, Bratislava.

Austrian authorities said they have been working closely with the FBI on the investigation, and the State Department said separately that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo talked on Wednesday with his Austrian counterpart, offering further support from Washington.

The attack in Vienna followed an attack in the French city of Nice in which four people were killed.

France has also begun to close mosques and is cracking down on organisations it suspects are spreading hatred.

However, there are fears of collective punishment and rising Islamophobia in France, especially after Barakacity, a prominent charity, was dissolved in late October.


Suggested Reading by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times, for the best understanding of personal religion in the 21st century

My main suggestion to the open minded readers is to read on and in the words of Sir Francis Bacon, “Read not to contradict … but to weigh and consider.”

Islamism — the Political Islam: The Challenge for the 21st Century

Are Religions Pluralistic or Myopic and Parochial?

The Holy Quran and the Seventh Century Arabian Metaphors

I am a Jew, a Catholic, a Christian and a Muslim; I am Zia H Shah

In Defense of the Secular Narrative of the Holy Quran

We Will be Judged by Our Compassion and Deeds and Not Our Dogma

Pope Francis: Satan Is Stalking The Catholic Church

A Message of Compassion and Love from the Holy Bible

Deciding to Leave: The Last Straw that Broke a Catholic’s Back!

Why it’s so hard to hold priests accountable for sex abuse

Abou Ben Adhem, A Compassionate Man

Americans are depressed and suicidal because something is wrong with our culture

Videos: Let Joel Osteen Breathe Hope, Optimism and Success in Your Life

What Can a Quarter of Unaffiliated US Population Find in Islam?

How Islam has Influenced Christian understanding of God

World Leading Christian Apologist, William Lane Craig Always Presents God of Islam and Judaism

24 Video lectures: The Great Courses: How Jesus Became God?

Video: The most famous Christian apologist, William Lane Craig, accepts there is no Trinity in the Old Testament

Book Review: The Dark Box: A Secret History of Confession

The Concept of Justice in Islam by Sir Zafrulla Khan

‘Islamic Law’: A Myopic Reading of the Quran

Proposing Daryl Davis as a Peace Maker for Palestinians and Israel, for he attends KKK rallies, despite being black

Kripkean Dogmatism: The Best Metaphor to Understand Religious and Political Debates

2 replies

  1. When looking closely at individuals who committed so-called terror offences we can see that they usually are petty criminals, drug and alcohol abusers, misfits in general who mostly have no knowledge of Islam at all. Just because they misguidedly shouted Allah-o-Akbar does not mean that they are part of political Islam. By misjudging the background of these guys actually all measures are targeting a wrong population and consequently will be counterproductive.

  2. The interesting issue about all this is that, when it’s a ‘home-grown’ person who commits such an act, NOBODY especially the media will give him the label of, e.g. Christian terrorist and also a whole army of psychologists, criminologists, etc., will go into the whys and wherefores of why the guy committed this offense, and they’ll go into great detail about his life including his disturbing childhood, etc.

    But, let a Muslim commit such an act as they did recently and just because he shouted ‘Allahu Akbar’ while committing his gruesome acts, the whole world immediately jumps to the collective conclusion that he is an Islamic terrorist and that his religion is the cause of him committing such an awful act!

    NOBODY will listen the countless and a billion or so Muslims out there even if they shout it from the rooftops, that Islam is a peaceful religion and what this moron has done has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with his supposed faith.

    This is so very SAD!

Leave a Reply