How Islam has Influenced Christian understanding of God


Say, ‘O People of the Book! come to a word common between us and you — that we worship none but Allah, and that we associate no partner with Him, and that some of us take not others for Lords besides Allah.’ But if they turn away, then say, ‘Bear witness that we have submitted to God.’ (Al Quran 3:64/65)


Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times

When Baylor University researchers asked their 1700 participants about what they think God looks like, 60 percent drew abstract or nature scenes.[1]

Stated in another way, the sons and daughters of the Abrahamic faiths, believe in a Deist God, Who is the Creator of our universe and is Transcendent, beyond time, space and matter.

Pope Francis has been making headlines recently by some of his liberal yet controversial remarks.  In a recent interview he talked about God, which was covered by International Business Times, with the heading, Pope Francis: ‘I Believe In God, Not In A Catholic God.’

The Pope said in the interview with  the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, as quoted by the Inquisitr. “Jesus is my teacher and my  pastor, but God, the Father, Abba, is the light and the Creator. This is my  Being. Do you think we are very far apart?”

The Pope did equivocate and hedge his bets, in his interview, but, if we go with the statement quoted, he is describing Islam rather than Catholicism and the heading covering the news, certainly talks about Unitarian understanding of God.

However, this Islamic influence is not a recent phenomenon, rather it dates to the very first interaction between the Muslims and the Christians, in the seventh and the eighth centuries.

The Holy Quran presents and demonstrates pure Monotheism and repeatedly stresses humanity of all the prophets, especially of the Holy Prophet Muhammad and the Prophet Jesus, may peace be on both of them.

It is said that a third of the Holy Quran is about describing and illustrating Monotheism of Islam and the Jewish and other prophets.

Since the time of Umar Farooq (Caliph from 634-644 CE), the Christians had constant interaction with the Muslims in the Middle East, North Africa and Asia Minor and gradually the pure teachings of Monotheism in Islam, influenced some of the Christians.

The Islamic influence is most apparent, in the life history of Emperor Leo III (c. 685 – 18 June 741), who was Byzantine Emperor from 717 until his death in 741.  According to a three hour documentary, Christianity, the First 1000 years:

Byzantium fails to take note of the rising giant from the sand of the desert.  … As the Islamic conquest sweep over North Africa, the Middle East and Asia Minor, Byzantine Empire seems helpless to stop the on slaught.  As he watches his dominions fall away, the newly crowned Emperor Leo searches for answers.  He seizes up on the notion that his imperial misfortunes are due not to strategic problems but to spiritual deviation.  The Emperor comes to believe that the Islamic conquest is God’s retribution, for the blasphemous worship of icons, images of Jesus, Mary and other saints.

The icons had long been the staples of Byzantine religious life.  But, now the Emperor convinces himself that the worship before an icon is actually bowing to wood and paint and is therefore, guilty of the sin of idolatry.

According to Encyclopedia Britannica, as it describes Pope Leo III’s efforts against the idolatrous practices among the Christians, in the early eighth century:

The origins and nature of his policy of Iconoclasm, the most singular religious development in his reign, are obscure and controversial. He was deeply religious and seems to have become genuinely convinced of the sacrilegious character of religious pictures and relics as objects of veneration in worship services. It is uncertain whether any boyhood experiences in northern Syria, including contact with Muslims, influenced his Iconoclastic views, as his critics often charged. The Iconoclastic opinions of certain bishops in western Asia Minor did, however, have some effect upon him. Thus, in 726 he began to speak out publicly against the use of sacred pictures.[2]

After an apparently successful attempt to enforce the baptism of all Jews and Montanists in the empire (722), Leo III issued a series of edicts against the worship of images (726–729).[6] This prohibition of a custom which had been in use for centuries, seems to have been inspired by a genuine desire to improve public morality, and received the support of the official aristocracy and a section of the clergy. A majority of the theologians and all the monks opposed these measures with uncompromising hostility, and in the western parts of the Empire the people refused to obey the edict.

A revolt which broke out in Greece, mainly on religious grounds, was crushed by the imperial fleet in 727. In 730, Patriarch Germanos I of Constantinople resigned rather than subscribe to an iconoclastic decree. Leo had him replaced by Anastasios,[7] who willingly sided with the Emperor on the question of icons. Thus Leo suppressed the overt opposition of the capital.

In the Italian Peninsula, the defiant attitude of Popes Gregory II and Gregory III on behalf of image-veneration led to a fierce quarrel with the Emperor. The former summoned councils in Rome to anathematize and excommunicate the iconoclasts (730, 732); In 740 Leo retaliated by transferring Southern Italy and Illyricum from the papal diocese to that of the Patriarch of Constantinople.[8] The struggle was accompanied by an armed outbreak in the exarchate of Ravenna in 727, which Leo finally endeavored to subdue by means of a large fleet.

Iconoclausts also called “icon-smashers,” were suspicious of any art depicting God or humans; they demanded the destruction of icons because they saw icons as idolatry.  They in general and Emperor Leo in particular seemed to have taken clues from the Muslims, in recalling prohibitions against idolatry and making of images of God, in the Old Testament.

The conflict around worship of the relics grew so strong that an Ecumenical Council needed to be called, to resolve the issue.  This is referred to as the Seventh Ecumenical Council, which took place in Nicea in 787 AD, and is also known as the Second Council of Nicaea.

According to Encyclopedia Britannica:

Council of Nicaea, (787), the seventh ecumenical council of the Christian church, meeting in Nicaea (now İznik, Tur.). It attempted to resolve the Iconoclastic Controversy, initiated in 726 when Emperor Leo III issued a decree against the worship of icons. The council declared that icons deserved reverence and veneration but not adoration. Convoked by the patriarch Tarasius, the council was attended by delegates of Pope Adrian I, and the pope confirmed the decrees of the council. Its authority was challenged in France as late as the 11th century.[3]

So, by saying, ‘icons deserved reverence and veneration but not adoration,’ the Council moved a step away from worship of icons and a little closer to the pure Monotheism of Islam.

There was a pope in the tenth century, who received his early education in the Muslim Spain: Sylvester II or Silvester II: A Pope, Who was Educated in Muslim Spain.

Let us now fast forward to the twenty first century.

In 2006, Baylor University’s Institute for Studies of Religion published the results from their extensive study on religion and spirituality. More than 1,700 people participated in Baylor’s study, and each of them answered nearly 400 questions about religion and spirituality.

According to the results of the survey, the American public described four primary types of God: an authoritarian God, a critical God, a distant God, and a benevolent God.

It remains unclear why we think anything exists or does not exist, but through research, we can explore questions such as: What does God look like? What does God feel like? What is God’s personality?  How are these attributes related to our own?

For example, when researchers asked participants about what they think God looks like, 60 percent drew abstract or nature scenes, 20 percent drew faces, and 15 percent were blank. However, a blank response did not always mean “no answer.” Among the atheists, 50 percent left it blank.[1]

The results are telling, no one tried to paint a picture of a Triune God, three persons and one being, because the Christians cannot simply, picture, imagine or conceive a Triune God.

Due to the near impossibility for human mind to comprehend a Triune God, as presented by Trinitarian Christianity, the day to day usage, of  the concept of God, by the Christian masses, reminds us of Judaism and Islam and the saying, ‘imitation is the best form of flattery.’

The Messiah , Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, explained that the Christians have written a lot about God, but, whatever genuine account they have given is about the true and the Living God of Islam and not about a dead, crucified and a humiliated god:

The Holy Quran is replete with wisdom and insights and does not contain any portion of babble or frivolous. It explains every necessary detail and provides for all human needs. It is a miracle from every aspect. I am ever ready to demonstrate the miracle and beauty of the Holy Quran to anyone who denies it. These days, concept of God and genuine understanding of monotheism are under fire. The Christians have written a lot about God, but, whatever genuine account they have given is about the true and the Living God of Islam and not about a dead, crucified and a humiliated god. I can declare it with fullest confidence that whoever, will attempt to write about the attributes of God, his or her hand will be forced to come to the God of Islam. This is because each and every particle of our universe gives testimony of this God and the imprint of the God of Islam is also in every human heart and conscience. So, whenever humans endeavor to find God, they are led to the concepts of Islam.[4]


The reader will recall that in the Baylor University study some sixty percent when asked to represent God, drew scenes from nature, to perhaps allude to God the Father, the Creator of our universe and twenty percent drew faces, perhaps recalling Jesus Christ, but, no one drew a dove or any representation of the Holy Ghost.

Trinity is the union of three divine persons in one being, according to the Christian dogma, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, but, in day to day life, in our times at least, the Holy Ghost finds little coverage in most denominations of Christianity.

So, in a manner of speaking the Triune God has become Bi-une.

However, given the Christian constant obsession with the memory of Jesus of Nazareth, we do hear a constant chant about Jesus along with genuine worship of God the Father.

Nevertheless, they have dropped one person out of the three, in the Triune conception, to an extent and it is not long before all the Christians will follow President Thomas Jefferson’s vision of pure Unitarianism, believing in God the Father to be the only God.

After his presidency years, Jefferson expressed general agreement with his friend Joseph Priestley’s Unitarianism, that is, the rejection of the doctrine of Trinity. In a letter to a Ohio pioneer he wrote:

I rejoice that in this blessed country of free inquiry and belief, which has surrendered its conscience to neither kings or priests, the genuine doctrine of only one God is reviving, and I trust that there is not a young man now living in the United States who will not die a Unitarian.[5]

His dream, however, of large scale conversion to the belief in One God was not to come true in the time of his contemporaries. Perhaps, it had to wait until the advent of Islam in the West, with millions of Muslims constantly interacting with their brethren and sisters, the children of Abraham, the fellow Christians.


1.  The Spiritual Brain: Science and Religious Experience.  Taught by  Andrew Newberg  University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.  The Teaching Company Course, Guide Book, 2012. Lecture 20, Pages 139-144.



4.  Malfoozat volume I.  Page 51-52.  Published in Rabwah.

For reference details see the Friday sermon of Khalifatul Masih V of 9/11/2009.

5. Letter to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse June 26, 1822.

Related readings

God of Islam: God of Nature and the Creator of our Universe

Is God the Father the Creator, the Trinity as a whole or are there three Creators?

President Thomas Jefferson — Was he a monotheist?

31 replies

  1. Well, we could also ask the question the other way around: How did Christians influence the Muslim’s understanding of, well, not God, but Jesus.

    Just by logical thinking I do not believe that any Muslims at the time of the Prophet Mohammad, peace and blessings of Allah be on him, believed that Jesus did not die and was ‘taken up to heaven alive’ (as most Muslims believe these days) (not the members of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community!). Why? Because when the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) died, did anyone say: ‘How can this be possible? Jesus did not die why should Mohammad (sas)?’ No. Nothing like this is reported to have happened.

    Consequently my feeling is that these ‘Christian beliefs’ my have entered Muslims thoughts when large numbers of Christians entered the fold of Islam in Egypt in a short time and were not fully ‘trained’ in all aspects.

    Do you agree with me or am I correct? Comments welcome …

  2. Rafiq wrote——believed that Jesus did not die and was ‘taken up to heaven alive’ (as most Muslims believe these days) (not the members of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community!). Why? Because when the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) died, did anyone say: ‘How can this be possible? Jesus did not die why should Mohammad (sas)?’ No. Nothing like this is reported to have happened.===

    Rafiq—- we discuss something that passed 2000 years ago.
    We cannot investigate except from Bible and Al Quran. Beside God’s word, we cannot trust or believe it.

    Bible say: Jesus died on the cross few days and then was taken to Heaven alive.
    Al Quran say; Jesus did not die,on the cross, but was taken to Heaven.
    Ahmadiyyah believe that Jesus died as human in India. But million Muslim and Christian do not believe that.

    Why did God say differently? Witch one is right?
    Only God know it.

    Million Christian believe what Bible say
    Millions Muslim believe what Al Quran say

    Both scholars accuse each other that Bible and Al Quran has corrupted.

    My suggestion: please do not accuse other belief. It is not wise at all. Let us improve or correct what wrong with Muslim today? Why God curse and punish million Muslim around the world?
    Let us try to find the right answer.
    All ❤️

    • Qur’an clearly says that Jesus died: “I said nothing to them except that which Thou didst command me – ‘Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die, Thou hast been the Watcher over them, and Thou art Witness over all things.”
      Holy Qur’an, Chapter 5, verse 118
      see also:

    • We believe that Allah sent the Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi to show us the correct path these days. His Khalifas are with us until this day when Hadhrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad is his fifth Khalifa. Consequently, could it not be that the favor of Allah is not with those who do not want to recognize him? Please reflect…

      • My respond was delated.
        If you do not agree, do not delate it, it is not nice.
        We should respect each other with different thought.
        May God bless you Amen
        All ❤️

  3. Rafiq— Your Caliph wrote, very interesting.

    ==Ahmadis say their mission is to disseminate the core values at the heart of Islam, such as love and respect for all, around the world. But the Caliph believes many people today no longer feel close to religion and have forgotten how to respect each other.===

    We should love and respect each other in order we can live in peace. Even though we disagree some issue.
    This is my hope.

Leave a Reply