Source: Asia Times:
The British Raj worked for 10 years to create Pakistan. In 1930, the British began to polarize irreconcilable enmities between Hindus and Muslim. Britain used agents working among Ismaeli Shi’ites and the Ahmadyya sect to pioneer the creation of an artificial country – by yoking together independent ethnic groups such as Pashtuns and Balochis.
The ongoing armed ethnic conflicts and wars inside Pakistan are indicative that Pakistan still remains an unsettled country and a nationless state. Al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists is the last weapon used by Punjabi generals in Rawalpindi to keep Pakistan as a country.
On the contrary, Afghanistan’s recent history offers ample evidence of resistance against the old colonial motto: divide and rule. During the past three decades, Afghanistan has had no functioning government, but it remained united against foreign invasions.
Categories: Asia
When such type of scholarly people support their view point with false allegations a person like me gets upset. Ahmadiyya is an Islamic religion reform movement. To practice real teachings of Islam without fear it supported the idea of Pakistan. Now if incompetent leaders took over the rein of governance in country you can not blame Ahmadiyya for supporting the creation of Pakistan. Please do not twist the facts of history.
The argument is rather primitive. Why use minority communities when planning a new country? And why should Britain have bothered?