Source: The Washington Post
By Kapil Komireddi, who is the author of “Malevolent Republic: A Short History of the New India.”
Prime Minister Narendra Modi used the Muslim-majority state as a demonstration of Hindu power.
For two weeks, Kashmir, India’s sole Muslim-majority state, has existed in a surreal state of nonexistence. Since a presidential decree abolished the state, revoked its autonomy and partitioned it into two federally administered territories, the Internet has been shut down, cellular networks have been disabled, and even landlines went dead. Public assembly is banned, and citizens are under curfew. A soldier has been stationed outside every house in some villages. Eight million people have been cut off from the world — and from one another. Pharmacies are running out of medicine, households are low on food, and hospitals are clogging up with injured protesters. Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, insists that all this is for the good of the Kashmiris. India’s grip on Kashmir has seldom been stronger. Its hold on Kashmiris, however, has never been more threadbare.
Modi’s sudden takeover in Kashmir is the fulfillment of a long ideological yearning to make a predominantly Muslim population surrender to his vision of a homogeneous Hindu nation. It is also a way of conveying to the rest of India — a union of dizzyingly diverse states — that no one is exempt from the Hindu-power paradise he wants to build on the subcontinent. Kashmir is both a warning and a template: Any state that deviates from this vision can be brought under Delhi’s thumb in the name of “unity.”
PM New Zealand: ‘The believers in their mutual kindness, compassion, and sympathy are just like one body’
Recommended by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times
Those who believe that such a day will never come — that India’s democratic institutions and minority protections will assert themselves — also never thought that someone like Modi would one day lead the country. Modi once seemed destined to disappear into history as a fanatical curio. As the newly appointed chief minister of Gujarat, he presided over the worst communal bloodletting in India’s recent history in 2002, when 1,000 Muslims, by a conservative estimate, were slaughtered by sword-wielding Hindus in his state over several weeks. Some accused Modi of abetting the mobs; others said he turned a blind eye to them. The carnage made Modi a pariah: Liberal Indians likened him to Hitler, the United States denied him a visa, and Britain and the European Union boycotted him.
Muslim Heritage is not only about the past but also one of the best tools to refute Islamophobia. Taj Mahal is not only a symbol of India but also Muslim Heritage, for which we have best collection of articles: https://t.co/gslGl1u6TS @musilmpoly @abdelalimx @SalmaJavidKhan pic.twitter.com/73Zg9kMPc0
— The Muslim Times (@The_MuslimTimes) November 9, 2017