Western dilemma: giving Putin Crimea to save Ukraine

Daily Times: KIEV: It is the ugly solution to the Ukrainian crisis world leaders will never acknowledge but grudgingly may have to accept.
Give Russian President Vladimir Putin Crimea — and hope this sates his ambition of being remembered as the omnipotent leader who restored Moscow’s post-Soviet might enough to leave the rest of Ukraine alone.
Such an appeasement strategy may not sit well with domestic critics of US President Barack Obama or former Soviet satellites in Eastern Europe that fear for their safety in the face of Putin’s belligerence.
But no big nation seems willing to wage war against Putin’s nuclear power in defence of Crimea — a Russian-speaking peninsula Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave to Ukraine as a “gift” in 1954.
And all would like to pull the rest of Ukraine out of the Kremlin’s orbit and have a friendly power on Russia’s western edge.
“The West might decide to hold its nose and look the other way with respect to the occupation, but only if Putin were to recognise the current Ukrainian government,” said Rutgers University-Newark professor Alexander Motyl.
“He would have to provide very explicit guarantees and the West would have to specify just what consequences his violations of such an agreement would have,” said the Ukrainian expert.
“Unfortunately, there is nothing in Putin’s rhetoric or actions to suggest that he will stop at Crimea.”
But James Nixey of London-based Chatham House countered that Putin “will not go any further — that is highly unlikely — (because) he has achieved what he wanted to achieve.”
“Crimea is lost,” Nixey told CNBC. “Crimea is gone.”
This is not the West’s public stance. “If there is an annexation of Crimea, a referendum that moves Crimea from Ukraine to Russia, we won’t recognize it,” US deputy national security adviser Tony Blinken told CNN.
And German Chancellor Angela Merkel — one of Western Europe’s more cautious leaders when it comes to imposing punitive measures on Russia — bluntly told Putin that Crimea’s March 16 referendum on joining Russia was “illegal”.
The tiny Baltic nations that the Soviet Union claimed during World War II are particularly anxious. Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite urged EU leaders attending an emergency summit in Brussels to “realise that what Russia is doing now is an attempt to redraw the post-war map and borders”.
But some analysts believe Putin’s main goal is to “punish” Ukraine’s new leaders while at the same time preserving some semblance of working relations with the West.
“For Russia to lose influence over Ukraine may be one thing, but losing its grip on Crimea and hence sufficient access to one of its two major fleets is one entirely different ball game and, it seems, just too much to stomach,” said Erik Nielsen of Italy’s UniCredit global bank group.

More:

Categories: Europe and Australia

1 reply

  1. We are living in an age of democracy. There should be no question of ‘giving crimea to Putin’, but the question should be: ‘where does the majority of the Crimean citizens want to belong to’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.