Perhaps there is who say that a rarity and is not fair when followers of Ahmadiyah prohibited conduct activity in Indonesia only because ideology or their beliefs though they are never do violence whatever. If, you think act of government / state prohibit (followers) Ahmadiyah move in Indonesia is wrong action then remember that man is no one who knows everything including you and me. Do you feel have knowledge is quite capable in association with the teachings of Islam, so brave declared that, Ahmadiyah is not feasible to be banned?
Al Falah Mosque, Bogor, Indonesia
Can we explain why Muslims especially MUI (scholars assembly of Indonesia) said Ahmadiyah is misguided and deserve to be banned, temporarily there is not statement from the Muslims especially MUI such that for the doctrine of Protestant, Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist? whereas if viewed use view of Islam clearly it’s teachings is ‘false / infidel’ as well these teachings too thought Islam as the doctrine of ‘false / infidel ‘.
The Muslims have right defend his Islamic religion if any other parties which tarnish their religion and they willing to die for it. And, the victims can certainly would far more better lives and treasures. Other religion is not right defend Ahmadiyah that is “breaking Islamic” with the reason “tolerance of religious people”. Muslims are very tolerant to other religions, but intolerant to breaking of Islam which damages Islam from the inside.
Categories: Ahmadiyyat: True Islam, Asia, Indonesia
The problem is that the sole decision on Islam are based on ulamas decree/verdict (fatwas) which their version of translation of “ayat” and hadith even overruled what had even been narrated by Muhammad (saw) and from the Al-Quran. The irony is that they cannot be queried as what they had issued as fatwas are correct being them as the most knowledgeable and supreme in Islamic studies. Allah (swt) Knows better than them.