Atheists versus Atheists: Daniel Dennett Finds the Very Idea of Zombies Incoherent

Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times

Hear Daniel Dennett around minute 19 of this video, Dennett denies the very idea of zombies and the philosophers who can imagine it as very stupid. He is not moved when the moderator lays out the details of fictional characters in video games. There one can appreciate how Dennett lacks imagination and not the other philosophers.

Dennett is caught in this awkward position in order to maintain his claim that consciousness is an illusion and the hard problem of consciousness does not exist.

Dennett is among the minority of academic philosophers who find zombies inconceivable. I quote from a poll of the philosophers, the publication is enclosed below as reference:

The following list summarizes the results for the target faculty group, collapsing answers that “accept” and “lean toward” a given view and collapsing all “other” answers. More fine-grained results can be found in Appendix 1.

  1. A priori knowledge: yes 71.1%; no 18.4%; other 10.5%.
  2. Abstract objects: Platonism 39.3%; nominalism 37.7%; other 23.0%.
  3. Aesthetic value: objective 41.0%; subjective 34.5%; other 24.5%.
  4. Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes 64.9%; no 27.1%; other 8.1%.
  5. Epistemic justification: externalism 42.7%; internalism 26.4%; other 30.8%.
  6. External world: non-skeptical realism 81.6%; skepticism 4.8%; idealism 4.3%; other
    9.2%.
  7. Free will: compatibilism 59.1%; libertarianism 13.7%; no free will 12.2%; other
    14.9%.
  8. God: atheism 72.8%; theism 14.6%; other 12.6%.
  9. Knowledge claims: contextualism 40.1%; invariantism 31.1%; relativism 2.9%;
    other 25.9%.
  10. Knowledge: empiricism 35.0%; rationalism 27.8%; other 37.2%.
  11. Laws of nature: non-Humean 57.1%; Humean 24.7%; other 18.2%.
  12. Logic: classical 51.6%; non-classical 15.4%; other 33.1%.
  13. Mental content: externalism 51.1%; internalism 20.0%; other 28.9%.
  14. Meta-ethics: moral realism 56.4%; moral anti-realism 27.7%; other 15.9%.
  15. Metaphilosophy: naturalism 49.8%; non-naturalism 25.9%; other 24.3%.
  16. Mind: physicalism 56.5%; non-physicalism 27.1%; other 16.4%.
  17. Moral judgment: cognitivism 65.7%; non-cognitivism 17.0%; other 17.3%.
  18. Moral motivation: internalism 34.9%; externalism 29.8%; other 35.3%.
  19. Newcomb’s problem: two boxes 31.4%; one box 21.3%; other 47.4%.
  20. Normative ethics: deontology 25.9%; consequentialism 23.6%; virtue ethics 18.2%;
    other 32.3%.
  21. Perceptual experience: representationalism 31.5%; qualia theory 12.2%; disjunctivism 11.0%; sense-datum theory 3.1%; other 42.2%.
  22. Personal identity: psychological view 33.6%; biological view 16.9%; further-fact
    view 12.2%; other 37.3%.
  23. Politics: egalitarianism 34.8%; communitarianism 14.3%; libertarianism 9.9%;
    other 41.0%.
  24. Proper names: Millian 34.5%; Fregean 28.7%; other 36.8%.
  25. Science: scientific realism 75.1%; scientific anti-realism 11.6%; other 13.3%.
  26. Teletransporter: survival 36.2%; death 31.1%; other 32.7%.
  27. Time: B-theory 26.3%; A-theory 15.5%; other 58.2%.
  28. Trolley problem: switch 68.2%; don’t switch 7.6%; other 24.2%.
  29. Truth: correspondence 50.8%; deflationary 24.8%; epistemic 6.9%; other 17.5%.
  30. Zombies: conceivable but not metaphysically possible 35.6%; metaphysically possible 23.3%; inconceivable 16.0%; other 25.1%.

Zombies are the last question in this survey and as you can see almost two-thirds of the academic philosophers can conceive the idea and Dennett has the audacity to call all of them stupid, is it to cover his stupidity in denying his own consciousness and all of his life experience and scholarship? He is now deceased and so shall we say that he claimed his consciousness was an illusion, even when he lived:

Reference

3 replies

Leave a Reply