Interior of Islamabad National Assembly
Mufti Mahmud – Declaration of Ahmadis as Non-Muslim (2 of 3)
The Parliament of Pakistan unanimously accepted a Bill and Constitutional Amendment declaring Ahmadis as non-Muslims, in 1974.
This is the audio description of the incident and the dialogue and presentation between Parliamentarians and Mirza Nasir of Ahmadi movement.
For details in english please visit: http://alhafeez.org/rashid/constipak….
The Notification by Govt. of Pakistan is given below:
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION
Islamabad, the 7th September 1974
This bill was introduced in the National Assembly on the 7th September 1974,
N.A. Bill No. 29 of 1974.
A Bill further to amend the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Whereas it is expedient further to amend the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the purposes hereinafter appearing;
It is hereby enacted as follows:– 1. Short title and commencemnet. — (1) This act may be called the Constitution (Second Amendment) Act, 1974.
2. (2) It shall come into force at once. Amendment of Article 106 of the Constitution. — In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, hereinafter referred to as the Constitution, in article 106, in clause (3) after the word “communities”, the words and brackets “and persons of the Qadiani group or the Lahori group (who called themselves ‘Ahmadis’) shall be inserted.
3. Amendment of Article 260 of the Constitution. — In the Constitution, in Article 260, after clause (2), the following new clause shall be added, namely:– (3) A person who does not believe in the absolute and unqualified finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon Him), the last of the Prophets or claims to be a prophet, in any sense of the word or of any description whatsoever, after Muhammad (peace be upon Him), or recognises such a claimant as a prophet or a religious reformer, is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution or Law.
Categories: Ahmadis And Pakistan, Ahmadiyyat: True Islam, Asia
Mufti sahib was speaking in Urdu and saying:
1. We decided to give the Ahmadis a chance to explain their point. Otherwise they would complain.
2. Mirza nasir Ahmad had statement 200 pages. he read that.
3. We asked nasir ahmad “what do they believe about Mirza Ghulam ahmad?”
4. He replied, “We believe in him as mmati Nabi i.e. a prophet in the Ummah of Muhammad s.a.w.s.
5. We asked him, “Has there been any other Ummati Nabi in this Ummah?”
6. He said, “No.”
7. We said, “hazrat Abu Bakr was the best in Ummah. He was not Nabi. How come Mirza sahib became a Nabi?”
This video is nmber 2 of 3. so incomplete…
I present an important Hadith here which will prove that the prophet in this Ummah will be born and he will not come from sky. Mufti Mehmood sahib also knows that hadith. He seemed to use that hadith in dialogue with Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad sahib.
Hadith: The prophet Muhammad s.a.w.s. said, “Abu Bakr afzal un naas fee hazi hil Ummate illa ainyakoona Nabiyyun.”
Trans: “Abu Bakr is the best person in this Ummah except that a prophet be born in this Ummah.”
So an exception is there. It means he will not be better than the prophet born in the Ummah.
This Hadith mentions the birth of a prophet in the ummah and not any prophet coming from heavens. Important word in the Hadith is “yakoona” which is used to create something from nothing. i.e. A thing which did not exist before.
The word is used in the Quran at many places. Please see “kun Fayakoon”. That is used to bring into existence something new from nothing.
So the hadith is giving hint of a prophet being born in this Ummah, not a prophet coming from abroad or from sky.
I can present a hadith Qudsi that prophets of Ahmad a.s. will be from his own Ummah.
above narration is fabricated and contradicts the quran and authentic hadith
Parvez, please point out which narration. Your post is very brief. Guide me with explanation.
Parvez says that hadith about Hazrat Abu Bakr being the best man in the Ummah is fabricated… parvez has not yet replied to my request for explanations.
Since the question from Mufti Mehmood sahib to hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad sahib (Rh.A) was about the Ummati Nabi, I had presented one Hadith on the subject. Parvez sahib has rejected that hadith. So I now present another Hadith on the same subject of Ummati Nabi. Please see:
About the Ummati Nabi, I present a Hadith
(Hadith Qudsi) which states that the prophets of this Ummah will be from the Ummah. That is a long hadith describing a dialogue between Allah and Hazrat Musa a.s.
——————————-
Allah spoke to Musa a.s. that any one who will not believe in Ahmad, I will throw him into Hell. Musa a.s. asked Allah, “Who is Ahmad?” Allah told him that he is my beloved. I have written his name on the high point in Arsh. He is a prophet of high rank. His (Ahmad’s ) followers are such good persons that they remember me when going uphill and seek blessings from me when going downhill.. (Words near to that kind were told to Musa a.s.)
Musa a.s. wanted to come as a prophet in the Ummah of Ahmad a.s. Musa a.s. beseeched Allah to make him a prophet in the Ummah of Ahmad a.s.
Allah told him that the prophets of his Ummah will be from his own Ummah. (Please note this point).
Then Musa a.s. requested Allah to make him an Ummati of Ahmad a.s. Allah told him, “that is not possible. You have appeared before him and he will come after you. But i will make you join (bring you together) on the last day (exact word, I can not remember for the day…). [End]
———————————–
So we note that the Prophets of hazrat Ahmad a.s. will be from his own Ummah. Also note that if Musa a.s. cannot come in the Ummah of Ahmad a.s. as an Ummati, then how can Isa a.s. come in this Ummah?
[The present day Mullas also happily believe that their Isa, when he will come down from sky, will be an ummati Nabi. ]
Ahmadis believe that the prophethood of Muhammad s.a.w.s. is a special nabuwwat. That is Because he is Khaatam an nabiyyeen. He is last law bearing prophet.
Now, no prophet can appear who is direct or permanent prophet and also no prophet can appear who is not an Ummati. (Words of hazrat Mulla Ali Qari, the great hanafi scholar, and also of hazrat Mohayuddin Ibne Aarbi ).
It is a new type of prophethood within the Ummah.
Love, Wassalam, XXXXX
both narrations are not found in the primary hadith literature.
the alleged narration; “Abu Bakr is the best person in this Ummah except that a prophet be born in this Ummah.”
the above reprt is not found in primary hadith source with connected chain of narrators.
and the alegged report regarding moses seems to state that prophets are going to be from this muslim ummah. then who are these prophets since its plural??
lets not forget the quran ch 33 vs 40 stating that muhammad (saw) is the last prophet and also many ahadith;
Quran says that Muhammah (peace be upon him) is indeed the seal of the Prophets.
Quran in ch 33 verse 40; Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and last of the prophets. And ever is Allah , of all things, Knowing.
thus its clear that prophet Muhammad (saw) is the last appointed prophet with the last divine book and complete shariah.
The prophet himself said that he is the last of the prohets and the Quran is the last revelation. The first 3 generations which are the best of generations agreed that the prophet muhammad (pbuh) is the last prophet.
“The tribe of Israel was guided by prophets. When a prophet passed away, another prophet succeeded him. But no prophet will come after me; only caliphs will succeed me.” [5]
Muhammad affirmed: “My position in relation to the prophets who came before me can be explained by the following example: A man erected a building and adorned this edifice with great beauty, but he left an empty niche, in the corner where just one brick was missing. People looked around the building and marvelled at its beauty, but wondered why a brick was missing from that niche? I am like unto that one missing brick and I am the last in the line of the Prophets.” [6]
“So I came and in me the line of Prophets has ended.” [7][8]
The very same tradition in similar words has been incorporated among other traditions reported by Jabir bin Abdullah; and its last sentence reads, “It is in me that line of Prophets came to its final end.” [9]
Musnad Ahmad contains traditions reported by Hadrat Ubayyi bin Ka’b, Hadrat Abu Sa’id Khudri and Hadrat Abu Huraira on the same subject with a slight variation of words here and there.[10]
Muhammad observed: “God has bestowed upon me six favors which the former Prophets did not enjoy:
I have been endowed with the gift of pithy and perfect speech.
I was granted victory owing to my awe.
The spoils of war were made lawful unto me.
The whole earth has been made the place of worship for me and it has become the means of purification for me also. In other words in my religion, offering of prayers is not confined to certain specified places of worship. Prayers can be offered at any place over the earth. And in case water is not available it is lawful for my people to perform ablutions with earth(Tayammum) and to cleanse themselves with the soil if water for bathing is scarce.
I have been sent by Allah to carry His Divine message to the whole world.
The line of prophets has come to its final end in me.[11]
Muhammad affirmed: “The chain of Messengers and Prophets has come to an end. There shall be no Messenger nor Prophet after me.” [12]
Muhammad observed: “I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am the effacer and infidelity shall be erased through me; I am the assembler. People shall be assembled on Doomsday after my time. (In other words Doom is my only successor.) And I am the last in the sense that no prophet shall succeed me.” [13]
Muhammad observed: “God Almighty hath sent unto the world no apostle who did not warn his people about the appearance of Dajjal( Anti-Christ, but Dajjal did not appear in their time). I am the last in the line of Prophets and ye are the last community of believers. Without doubt,then, Dajjal shall appear from amongst ye”.[14]
‘Abdur Rahman bin Jubair reported: “I heard Abdullah bin ‘Amr ibn-’As narrating that one day Muhammad came out of his house and joined our company. His manner gave us the impression as if he were leaving us.’ He said, ‘I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah’ and repeated this statement three times. Then he affirmed: “There will be no prophet after me’.” [15]
Muhammad said: “Allah will send no Apostle after me, but only Mubashshirat. It was said: what is meant by al-Mubashshirat. He said : Good vision or pious vision”.[16] (In other words there is no possibility of Divine revelation in future. At the most if some one receives an inspiration from Allah he will receive it in the form of “pious dream.”[17]
Muhammad said: “If an Apostle were to succeed me, it would have been ‘Umar bin Khattab.” [18]
Muhammad told ‘Ali, “You are related to me as Aaron was related to Moses. But no Apostle will come after me.”[19]
This tradition is recorded in Bukhari and Muslim in the account of the Battle of Tabuk also. Musnad records two traditions narrated by Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas on this subject. The last sentence in one of these traditions runs as follows : “Behold there is no prophethood after me.”
Detailed accounts of the traditions report that on the eve of his departure for the battle of Tabuk, Muhammad had resolved to leave Hadrat ‘Ali behind him in order to look after the defense and supervise the affairs of Medina. The hypocrites thereupon began to spread insinuations and rumours about Hadrat ‘Ali. Hadrat ‘Ali went to the Prophet and submitted : ‘O Prophet of Allah, are you leaving me behind among women and children?’ On this occasion in order to set his mind at peace Muhammad observed: “You are related to me as was Aaron with Moses.” In other words “as Hadrat Moses on the Mount Tur had left Hadrat Aaron behind to look after the tribe of Israel, so I (Muhammad) leave you behind to look after the defense of Medina.” At the same time apprehending that this comparative allusion to Hadrat Aaron might later on give rise to heresies, the Muhammad immediately made it clear that “There will be no Prophet after me.” [20]
Thauban reports: “Muhammad observed: And there will arise Thirty imposters in my Ummah and each one of them will pronounce to the world that he is a prophet, but I am the last in the line of the Prophets of God and no Apostle will come after me.” [21]
Abu Dawud in ‘Kitab-ul-Malahim’ has recorded another tradition reported by Abu Huraira in the same subject. Tirmidhi has also recorded these two traditions as reported by Thauban and Abu Huraira. The text of the second tradition runs thus: “It will come to this that thirty imposters will arise and each one of them will put forth his claim to be the Apostle of God.” Muhammad observed: “Among the tribe of Israel who went before you there indeed were such people who held communion with God, even though they were not his Prophets. If ever there arose a person from among my people who would hold communion with God, it would be none else but ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with him).” [22]
A version of this same tradition in `Muslim’ contains Muhaddithuna instead of Yukallimuna. But then Mukalima and Muhaddith bear identical meaning i.e., a man enjoys the privilege of holding direct communion with God or a person who is addressed by the Almighty from the unseen. Thus we conclude that if there had been any person among the followers of Muhammad who could hold communion with God without being raised to the dignity of prophethood, it would have been `Umar.
Muhammad said: “No Prophet will come after me and there will, therefore, be no other community of followers of any new prophet.” [23]
Muhammad observed: “I am the last in line of the prophets of God and my Masjid is the last Masjid (referring the holy Masjid of the Prophet).” [24]
A large number of such traditions of Muhammad have been reported by the companions and a great many compilers have recorded them from authoritative sources. A study of these traditions shows that Muhammad, on several occasions, and in various ways and in different words made it explicitly clear that he was the last prophet of God; that no prophet would follow him and that the line of prophets had ended in him. Furthermore, those would claim to be prophets and messengers of God after his time would be imposters and liars.
There can be no authentic, creditable and conclusive interpretation of the words of the Qur’an, Khatam-un- Nabiyyin, than that given by Muhammad for the credentials of Muhammad need no proof and the authority of his words is unassailable. His words are authentic and a proof in itself. When Muhammad is explaining a Nass of the Holy Quran, his explanation is the most authentic and a proof
positive.
^ Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib and Tafsir ibn kathir
^ Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib
^ Muslim, Kitab-ul-Fada’il, Bab-ul-Khatimin-Nabiyyin
^ Tirmidhi, Kitab-ul-Manaqib, Bab-Fadlin Nabi and Kitab-Adab, Bab-ul-Amthal
^ Musnad Abu Dawud Tayalisi
^ Musanad Ahmad bin Hanbal
^ Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah
^ Tirmidhi, Kitab-ur-Rouya Babu Zahab-un- Nubuwwa, Musnad Ahmad, Marwiyat-Anas bin Malik
^ Bukhari and Muslim, Kitab-ul-Fada’il, Bab: Asmaun-Nabi; Tirmidhi, Kitab-ul- Adab, Bab: Asma-un-Nabi; malik’s Muatta’, Kitab-u-Asma in-Nabi, Al- Mustadrak Hakim, Kitab-ut-Tarikh, Bab: Asma-un-Nabi.
^ Ibn Majah, Kitabul-fitan, bab:Dajjal
^ Musnad Ahmad, Marwiyat’Abdullah bin Amr ibn’-As.
^ Musnad Ahmad, Marwiyat Abu Tufail, Nasa’i, Abu Dawud
^ Finality of Prophet by suyuti
^ Tirmidhi,Kitab-ul- Manaqib
^ Bukhari and Muslim, Kitab Fada’il as-Sahaba
^ Abu Dawud Tayalisi, Imam Ahmad and Muhammad bin Ishaque
^ Abu Dawud, Kitab-ul-Fitan
^ Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib
^ Baihaqi,Kitab-ul Rouya; Tabarani
^ Muslim, Kitab-ul-Hajj; Bab:Fadl-us-Salat bi Masjidi Mecca wal Medina
^ The Finality of Prophethood by ibn kathir
^ Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Manaqib
^ Baihaqi,Kitab-ul Rouya; Tabarani
^ Muslim, Kitab-ul-Hajj
Elephant in the room: A fallacy in Sunni Doctrine