Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD
Epigraph: “Surely, the Believers, and the Jews, and the Christians and the Sabians — whichever party from among these truly believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good deeds — shall have their reward with their Lord, and no fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve.” (Al Quran 2:63)
Christian emphasis on Original Sin and the story that goes with it
Huffington Post reported on May 22, 2013 in an article titled, Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed, Not Just Catholics:
Atheists should be seen as good people if they do good, Pope Francis said on Wednesday in his latest urging that people of all religions – or no religion – work together.
The leader of the world’s 1.2 billion Roman Catholics made his comments in the homily of his morning Mass in his residence, a daily event where he speaks without prepared comments.
He told the story of a Catholic who asked a priest if even atheists had been redeemed by Jesus.
‘Even them, everyone,’ the pope answered, according to Vatican Radio. “We all have the duty to do good,” he said.
‘Just do good and we’ll find a meeting point,’ the pope said in a hypothetical conversation in which someone told a priest: ‘But I don’t believe. I’m an atheist.’
Francis’s reaching out to atheists and people who belong to no religion is a marked contrast to the attitude of former Pope Benedict, who sometimes left non-Catholics feeling that he saw them as second-class believers.
This reminds me more of Islam, with emphasis on our works rather than traditional Christianity, with its dogma of Original Sin, which needs to be overcome by Baptism and belief in Jesus’ death on the cross.
St. Paul will not be happy with the Pope Francis’ apparent denial of the Original Sin.
The concept of the Original Sin was first alluded to in the 2nd century by Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons in his controversy (written in Greek) with certain dualist Gnostics.[2] Its scriptural foundation is based on the New Testament teaching of St. Paul (Romans 5:12-21 and 1 Corinthians 15:22).
Tertullian, Cyprian, Ambrose and Ambrosiaster considered that mankind shares in Adam’s sin, transmitted by human generation.
Traditionally, Christianity has emphasized belief in Jesus’ dying on the cross for our sins, as a necessary condition for salvation. For St. Paul, the Original Sin and death and ‘Resurrection’ of Jesus and hence salvation, are closely interwoven. As he is quoted in the New Testament:
And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. (1 Corinthians 15:17)
There was a time, when even the unbaptized innocent children could not go to heaven and the Catholic Church had to coin the concept of Limbo.
But, at any rate, Pope Francis’ flexibility is a welcome change, as the original Christianity or the teachings of Jesus, may peace be on him, were similar to Islam, as are reflected in the Book of James, in the Bible:
What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them?
Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,’ but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.
But someone will say, ‘You have faith; I have deeds.’
Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.
You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, ‘Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,’ and he was called God’s friend. You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone.
In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead. (James 2:14-26, New International Version)
For 20 centuries these passages from the Book of James have been ignored in favor of what St. Paul had to say:
Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man (Adam), and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned— for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.
But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous. (Romans 5:12-19)
Also see Romans 4:1-5, Galatians 3:1-7, and Genesis 15:6.
The Protestants took St. Paul’s teachings to one extreme, by making good works completely redundant in their teaching of Sola fide.
Sola fide (Latin: by faith alone), also historically known as the doctrine of justification by faith alone, is a Christian theological doctrine that distinguishes most Protestant denominations from Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity, and some in the Restoration Movement.
The doctrine of sola fide or “by faith alone” asserts God’s pardon for guilty sinners is granted to and received through faith, conceived as excluding all “works,” alone. All mankind, it is asserted, is fallen and sinful, under the curse of God, and incapable of saving itself from God’s wrath and curse. But God, on the basis of the life, death, and resurrection of his Son, Jesus Christ alone (solus Christus), grants sinners judicial pardon, or justification, which is received solely through faith.
Epilogue
The Huffington Post article also highlighted:
Of course, not all Christians believe that those who don’t believe will be redeemed, and the Pope’s words may spark memories of the deep divisions from the Protestant reformation over the belief in redemption through grace versus redemption through works.
One wonders what has motivated the Pope to trigger a huge controversy not only with the Protestants but also with the Catholic tradition, stretching over centuries?
It may be that with large segments of European society, especially the younger generations becoming agnostic or atheist, the Catholic Church is coming out with a new music, a new liberal symphony, to retain some control over them.
But, would the Church extend this courtesy to other religions also, like Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism, remains to be seen?
Islam promises salvation to all, based on their good works and inner truth, as highlighted in the verse quoted, as an epigraph to this article:
Surely, the Believers, and the Jews, and the Christians and the Sabians — whichever party from among these truly believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good deeds — shall have their reward with their Lord, and no fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve. (Al Quran 2:63)
How the Church will reconcile the past dogmas and doctrines stretching over twenty centuries with this new found liberal outlook, would be an even greater challenge?
May be this equivocation and hedging of bets by Pope Francis will eventually throw the whole of Christianity, into the lap of Islam, which does not teach any irrational dogma and has always preached the balance between belief and actions. (Al Quran 2:1-6 & 103:1-4)
Categories: Catholicism

Thank you Shah sahib for this great presentation. I am surprised to read about the book of James. It seems to be very near to our Islamic teachings. It is totally against the teachings of Paul. Paul said “You will be saved by faith alone” i.e. you do not need any good deeds.
The book of James is stressing upon faith and deeds (both), just same as it is in the Quran.
You have also got a very good point that if Pope is kind to the atheists then he should think of other faiths people too who are not atheists; who already believe in God.
And your presentation of the verse 2:63 of the Quran is important, already accommodating the believers of all faiths who do good deeds. This doing of good deeds is very important.
The verse 2:63 is telling that a person may be of any faith and may not believe in the prophet Muhammad s.a.w.s., but must be peaceful person, he/she has nothing to fear.
It is a good advice to people of all faiths to do good deeds. Muslims are also included in the list because it would be odd to give a lesson of good deeds to others and to miss out the Muslims out of it. Muslims are the first to follow that advice.
I believe the verse is important for interfaith dailogue. The real purpose is to make peace and not to call every believer a Kafir. Then without any compulsion, people will be able to adopt the religion of Islam. The real purpose is that every one believes in Allah and His messenger (Muhammad s.a.w.s.) That purpose can be achieved by establishing peace in every society. Then every one will have liberty to accept Islam or reject it.
From your writing, I noted another flaw of the BibleNT (teachings of Paul). Paul said death came with the sin. That meant there was no death until hazrat Adam a.s. ate the apple and committed sin. It means there was no mankind before Adam. That is another bad teaching of the Bible. Surely there were many men and women on the earth who were living and dying before Adam.
And the bad belief that every new born baby is a sinner and the bad belief that every prophet of God is sinner (except Jesus). How can church justify all these things?
Thank you for the very informative commentary. I remember the Fourth Ahmadiyya Khalifa (rh) explaining that “Sabians” in the Holy Quran were people in Arabia who believed in God but their prophets were not of the Abrahamic lineage (if I remember correctly), and thus by including Sabians, God has included believers of all the faiths whose prophets are not mentioned in the Holy Quran by name.
And of course the Holy Quran mentions that “…and there is no people to whom a Warner has not been sent.” (Quran Ch35:v24/25)
The Promised Messiah, Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (a.s.) had said:
“Of all the principles to which I have been made to adhere firmly, one, regarding which God has informed me, is that all the religions that have spread in the world through the prophets, and are firmly established, and have spread on a part of the world, and have gotten old and have stood the test of time — no such religion is false in its origin, and no such prophet is false (i.e. ‘their founders were true prophets of God’).” (Tohfa Qaisariya: Roohani Khazain Vol. 12, p256)
Thus, as explained by Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad in Revelation Rationality Knowledge and Truth, this includes not only religions like Hinduism and Christianity, but the lesser known faiths of the Aborigines of Australia and native peoples of North America, among many others.
James, the Just, was the man who opposed Paul and he deserves much respect in my opinion. Historical evidence shows the Ebionites (who believed in the unity of God) rejected Paul and revered James. According to Wikipedia (someone confirm this?) Warqah bin Noefal (may Allah be pleased with him) was an Ebionite.
In any case Ebionites were absorbed by Islam.