US Supreme Court won’t hear Catholic Church challenge to ban on religious advertising

Source: USA Today

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear the Catholic Church’s challenge to a local ban on religious advertising.

The case, brought by the Archdiocese of Washington against the District of Columbia region’s mass transit system, would have been the latest example of religious freedom appeals heard by the conservative-leaning court.

The justices already are considering four major religion cases, all brought to them by religious organizations after lower court losses:

• School choice: Three Montana women challenged a Montana ban on state funds being used to pay for religious education.

• Employment discrimination: Two Catholic schools in California claim the right to fire teachers under a “ministerial exception” to job discrimination laws.

• Birth control: The Trump administration wants employers and universities with religious or moral objections to be able to deny women insurance coverage for contraceptives, as required by the Affordable Care Act.

• Foster care: Catholic agencies providing foster care in Philadelphia want the right to turn down gay and lesbian couples based on religious convictions.

The new case stemmed from the archdiocese’s effort in 2017 to place ads on buses and  subway trains depicting the silhouette of three shepherds and sheep with the message “Find the Perfect Gift.” The ads directed viewers to Mass schedules while encouraging service projects and charitable giving.

The Christmas-themed ads bumped up against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s policy of banning religious, political and issue-oriented messages, enacted after complaints about an anti-Islam ad.

The Catholic Church wasn’t alone in its challenge. Other groups fighting the policy ranged from the American Civil Liberties Union to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. A federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with the transit system.

“Were the Archdiocese to prevail, WMATA (and other transit systems) would have to accept all types of advertisements to maintain viewpoint neutrality, including ads criticizing and disparaging religion and religious tenets or practices,” Judge Judith Rogers wrote.

Read further


Suggested reading by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times, for secularism in every country

What Every Muslim, Christian and Jew needs to know: The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath

The Prophet’s Greatest Victory According to the Quran: A Peace Treaty

Eating Beef in India; Another Reason Why World Needs Secularism in Our Global Village

In Defense of the Secular Narrative of the Holy Quran

Eating Beef in India; Another Reason Why World Needs Secularism in Our Global Village

Why Secularism Is Compatible with the Quran and Sunnah — And an ‘Islamic State’ Is Not

The Muslim Times has the best collection of articles promoting secularism in every country of the world

Book Review: Muslims Learning Secularism from Jesus Son of Mary

CNN Documentary: Ultra-orthodox Jews and Israel’s Struggle with Secularism

Why Did Muhammad Fly to Jerusalem?

How can we build the Third Temple together?

The Hypocrisy of Quebec’s MNAs on Full Display in the Crucifix in the Parliament Building

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Delivers Sharp Dissent In Supreme Court Cross Case

The state is for all – and religion for the individual

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.