Palestinians face uphill battle against Trump’s Middle East plan

Jan 31, 2020 –  swissinfo.ch

By Rami Ayyub

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – When Palestinian leaders learned that the release of U.S. President Donald Trump’s Middle East plan was imminent, they swiftly announced a “day of rage” – a gritty, oft-used call for resistance against Israel.

But few demonstrators actually took to the streets despite Palestinians’ broad rejection of Trump’s proposal, a gap between rhetoric and delivery that exposes the scale of the challenge their leaders face in pressuring the United States and Israel.

As in past decades, critics are branding the Palestinians as naysayers, continually rejecting offers of a settlement in the hope, so far futile, of something better to come.

And domestic frustration with the Palestinian leadership has been building for years, with an ageing Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas seeking a legacy but having dwindling scope to demonstrate progress towards his people’s dream of freedom.

Contrary to expectations, Trump did propose a “two-state” solution for the conflict – but with strict conditions that would leave any future Palestinian state under near-complete Israeli security control.

Trump’s endorsement of Israel keeping its settlements delighted right-wingers, who immediately urged the extension of Israeli sovereignty to nearly 30% of the occupied West Bank, which Israel captured in a 1967 war.

Palestinians say such moves would lead to apartheid. Israel rejects any comparison of its policies towards the Palestinians to South Africa’s former system of legally-mandated racial segregation.

Analysts say that Palestinians face a difficult road ahead.

For a graphic on the Trump proposal, click https://graphics.reuters.com/ISRAEL-PALESTINIANS-PLAN/0100B5B73B0/ISRAEL-PALESTINIANS-PLAN.jpg

“They don’t have good options. Responding positively to the Trump peace plan is impossible for any Palestinian leader. He would be seen as having sold out the Palestinian national cause completely,” said Greg Shapland, a Middle East specialist at London’s Chatham House think tank.

“(This) whole exercise seems to be structured in such a way that the Palestinians would have to refuse it and then the Americans can say to Israel and to the rest of the world, ‘go ahead and do it’ because the Palestinians are clearly not interested in peace,” Shapland said.

That attack line has already been used by Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and principal architect of the plan.

“We’re not going to chase the Palestinians,” he told reporters. “It will be very hard for them to play the victim card when they basically have a real deal on the table.”

INTERNATIONAL OPPOSITION

One avenue for Abbas, 84, is to use the United Nations to drum up international opposition to Trump’s plan.

But Washington can veto any move in the Security Council. And even if Abbas wins support in the General Assembly it will have little more practical effect than a 2017 vote calling on Trump to drop his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

That secured 128 of 193 votes in support of the Palestinian argument, but was only a rhetorical show of support.

Abbas will also try other routes. On Saturday he travels to Cairo for a meeting of the Arab League, where he will engage regional allies.

But many Arab states rely on U.S. military aid or financial backing. And most are led by Sunni Muslim administrations that are aligned with the United States and Israel in confronting Iran’s revolutionary Shi’ite theocracy.

Diana Buttu, a former legal adviser to the Palestine Liberation Organization, said it was important to “hold the (Arab) states who were part of this charade to account” but that it wasn’t likely to strengthen the Palestinians’ hand.

“A better strategy is to begin to hold Israel accountable, whether it’s through sanctions or legal (moves),” she said.

One such legal move is at the International Criminal Court, whose chief prosecutor is seeking an investigation into alleged war crimes in the Palestinian Territories.

The court is still deciding if it has jurisdiction. Israel says the court has no jurisdiction to investigate the Palestinian Territories.

(Additional reporting by Stephen Farrell in Jerusalem, Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza, Ali Sawafta in Ramallah, Michelle Nichols in New York and Luke Baker in London, Editing by William Maclean)
 

SOURCE:   

 

SWI swissinfo.ch, a branch of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation

2 replies

  1. Trump did propose a “two-state” solution for the conflict – but with strict conditions that would leave any future Palestinian state under near-complete Israeli security control.—- there is a little of bit light — much better than the current darkness.

    If you do not take this opportunity now, you will miss it for another 70 years .

    You have a good chance to build love each other instead of hatred for another century. Think about that and leave your pride. It is evil.

    • The so-called ‘Palestinian State’ would be like no other state in the world, you have to agree. Sort of like the jail that Gaza is now, with all entry points controlled by Israel and anything, including cement and water depending on the good-will of the Israeli politicians. Come on ! Would you choose to live in such a ghetto? (coming to think of it: that’s it. Israel planning that as many residents as possible will leave and never return).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.