Ayodhya verdict: Indian top court gives holy site to Hindus


Indian media gathered outside the Supreme Court in Delhi for the verdict

The disputed holy site of Ayodhya in northern India should be given to Hindus who want a temple built there, the country’s Supreme Court has ruled.

The case, which has been bitterly contested for decades by Hindus and Muslims, centres on the ownership of the land in Uttar Pradesh state.

Muslims would get another plot of land to construct a mosque, the court said.

Many Hindus believe the site is the birthplace of one of their most revered deities, Lord Ram.

Muslims say they have worshipped there for generations.

The complex history of India’s Ayodhya holy site

At the centre of the row is the 16th Century Babri mosque which was demolished by Hindu mobs in 1992, sparking riots that killed nearly 2,000 people.

What did the court say?

In the unanimous verdict, the court said that a report by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) provided evidence that the remains of a building “that was not Islamic” beneath the structure of the demolished Babri mosque.

The court said that, given all the evidence presented, it had determined that the disputed land should be given to Hindus for a temple to Lord Ram, while Muslims would be given land elsewhere to construct a mosque.



Categories: Asia, Islam

Tagged as: , ,

2 replies

  1. I would hope that the Indian Muslims will also say ‘let them have it’. Muslims are fortunate that Allah is everywhere and we can pray everywhere. It their God is born there, let them have that place.

  2. In this case I agree that the site should be returned to the Hindus, where it seems a temple had already existed when the Muslims arrived and demolished it in order to establish themselves. This was common practice, and not just with Muslims.

Leave a Reply