Video: The world’s best known atheist, Richard Dawkins does seem to believe in a Creator God

Epigraph:

Who has created seven heavens in harmony. No incongruity canst thou see in the creation of the Gracious God. Then look again: Seest thou any flaw?

Aye, look again, and yet again, thy sight will only return unto thee confused and fatigued. (Al Quran 67:4-5)

Written and collected by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times

Apparently the world’s best known atheist, Richard Dawkins does seem to believe in a Creator God, who has fine tuned the universe for us. His 12 minute presentation in the debate, This House Believes Religion Has No Place In The 21st Century | The Cambridge Union. In the video below Dawkins’ presentation starts around minute 29.00:

If he does believe in a Creator God, we can take it from there.  A lot of his misunderstandings stem from his knowledge of only Christianity rather than Islam and his obsession with the negative consequences of political Islam.  In fact I have a presentation, to solve his dilemma: If the Atheists and the Christians Debate, Islam Wins!

Incidentally, we do have some common agenda with him.  The Muslim Times is trying to promote secularism in every country of the world, but, at a personal level we are all dependent on the Provident God, who is the Creator of our universe and is the most Merciful and Gracious.

I have been extending a challenge to Dawkins for several years, but, as expected, he has been ignoring: A challenge for Dawkins: Where did carbon come from? However, today after I tweeted this post, through the Muslim Times’ account with more than 36,000 followers, he decided to respond by calling me deluded.  I see it as a compliment in disguise; I will tell you in a minute why.  First his tweet:

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I believe it is a compliment in disguise, because I am a fan of Mahatma Gandhi, who said: “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win.”

first-they-ignore-you-then-you-win-gandhi-1024x576

I am thankful to Prof. Dawkins for promoting me to the second stage.  The third stage will be when we actually discuss and debate.  It may come soon if I can have a few hundred thousand followers in Twitter. Stay tuned until then.

You be the judge and listen to his presentation again.  Am I deluded or is Richard Dawkins over reacting?  He said in the video and I quote:

I could go for a God, whose primary business was to create the cosmos, to set up the laws of physics, to twiddle the knobs that fine tune the physical constants in such a way as to foster the eventual emergence of biological evolution.  Such a God, a grand God, the God of the Cosmos, the God of the physicist, the God of the hyper-mathematician, the God of the master architect that would be a God worth worshiping.

Did I make this up, my ears fail me or he actually said all this? You tell me! Of course he said more.  But, what does the above quote mean?

Additional Reading & Viewing

How Islam has Influenced Christian understanding of God

Video: The Transcendent God of Abrahamic Faiths Does Exist: The Kalam Cosmological Argument

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

We have saved the above video in the Muslim Times also for the posterity:

1 reply

  1. Suggested Reading

    Do atheists secretly believe in God? Finnish Study

    Published on Feb 3, 2013
    The debate is also available on iTunes at the Cambridge Union Society channel: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/c

    Follow the Cambridge Union Society on twitter:
    https://twitter.com/cambridgeunion

    Is Religion compatible with 21st Century life? How can it be made to fit with modern laws and values? Even if it might be compatible, does it actually do more harm than good?

    PROPOSITION:
    01:54 Andrew Copson – Chief Executive of the British Humanist Association and former director of the European Humanist Federation.

    29:42 Prof. Richard Dawkins – A distinguished evoultionary biologist and ardent critic of religion, Dawkins is also Vice-President of the British Humanist Association and author of The God Delusion and The Selfish Gene.

    1:10:30 Arif Ahmed – Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge since October 2011.

    OPPOSITION:
    13:33 Rowan Williams – Outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury and now the Master of Magdalene College, Rowan Williams studied Theology at Cambridge and has written inumerable books on the subject of Christianity.

    42:28 Prof. Tariq Ramadan – Known as ‘The Muslim Martin Luther’, Ramadan is a renowned writer and Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Oxford. He is also President of the European Muslim Network.

    1:22:25 Douglas Murray – Associate Director of the Henry Jackson Society and founder of the Centre for Social Cohesion, Murray is also a commentator on issues of religion, immigration and extremism.

    Result:
    Ayes: 138
    Noes: 324
    The Motion failed to pass

    The video in this post was published on Nov 12, 2014 in Youtube
    Atheist Richard Dawkins takes on Archbishop of Canterbury, Science vs God Debate.
    Science vs Religion
    atheist debate
    Oxford University

    Science vs God Richard Dawkins takes on Archbishop of Canterbury

    Richard Dawkins went head-to-head with Rowan Williams in a televised debate about evolution. So who won?

    The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, was going head to head in a public debate with the leading secularist Richard Dawkins.

    The archbishop and the atheist were going to battle it out in front of a packed house at Oxford University’s c.

    In the end it was more Thought for the Day than Frost-Nixon or Frazier-Ali. atheism debate.

    It began with the air of an upmarket version of boxing at the Albert Hall, when the two contenders were led through the audience into the elegant, rounded amphitheatre of the Sheldonian. religion debate. Richard Dawkins Teaching Evolution to Religious Students.

    But it became a rather polite philosophical chess game, with the two opponents testing out each others’ well-rehearsed defences.