Jesus wasn’t crucified but died a Buddhist monk in Kashmir, book contends

By Los Angeles Times

Baltimore Sun

Dec 25, 1994

NEW DEHLI, INDIA — NEW DELHI, India — This weekend, Christians by the hundreds of millions the world over mark one of the most joyous events in the ecclesiastical year. But what became of the infant ++ whose birth is celebrated at Christmas?

The Bible, of course, tells the story. But a German dissenter with a diploma in theology is offering his own version in a controversial book now for sale in bookstores in India and elsewhere.

The title of Holger Kersten’s work, amplified and republished this year after selling 1.5 million copies worldwide, says it all: “Jesus Lived in India.”

In a nutshell, he proposes that the son of Joseph and Mary traveled to India when young, imbibed the Buddhist philosophy and world view at the feet of Buddhist monks, then returned to propagate his findings among his people in Palestine.

Marshaling evidence including the now-discredited Shroud of Turin, etymology, the writings of a 19th-century Russian adventurer and sermons preached by Jesus as he tramped through the Holy Land, Mr. Kersten asserts that Christ did not die on the cross but survived and returned to India.

In the remote Himalayan land of Kashmir, Jesus (known then as “Issa”) lived to a ripe old age as a Buddhist monk, according to Mr. Kersten. His tomb, he says, appears to be situated in the Kashmiri city of Srinagar, where, in point of fact, it is venerated to this day.

Whatever the truth about Jesus,the book is a reminder of the extraordinary importance India has exerted through the centuries the human spirit.

Ritual baptism and monastic asceticism are among its exports. According to Mr. Kersten, even Jesus’ parable of the widow’s mite, cited in the Gospel according to St. Mark, seems to be a reworking of an older Buddhist story.

Another work of Mr. Kersten, to be published in English next March, enumerates the parallels between the teachings of Jesus and Siddhartha Gautama, the Indian prince and ascetic who founded Buddhism.

Mr. Kersten contends that Jesus’ original message was hijacked by the Apostle Paul, who introduced new elements, including misogyny and the concept that Christ’s death absolved others of their sins.

“I am a follower of Jesus but not a Christian in its original meaning,” said Mr. Kersten, who used to teach the precepts of Christianity in state adult vocational schools until his doubts sent him on a search that ended in India.

Mainstream Christians could rightly note that Mr. Kersten’s ideas are heresy. In its 264 pages, the book denies the central tenet of Christianity: that the Son of God died to atone for humanity’s sins.

“There are so many kinds of books from this ‘New Age’ stream that the church doesn’t take any notice of them anymore,” said Brother Jeffrey Gros, associate director of ecumenical and religious affairs at the National Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Kersten’s book notes similarities in the lives and messages of Jesus Christ and Buddha. The Sermon on the Mount, he says, has its forerunners in older Buddhist scriptures like the Lalitavistara.

“What Jesus really meant is the way of karma, that you are of course responsible for your own doings,” Mr. Kersten said.

And what of Christmas? Mr. Kersten says research shows it is the Christian reworking of the annual celebrations that used to mark the Dec. 25 birth of the ancient Persian sun deity, Mithras. He plans to celebrate it anyway: “I go to my parents’ because they like it.”


and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community’s view.

Jesus in Kashmir

A London Mosque Publication

The fundamental doctrines of Christian Church are based upon the death of Jesus on the Cross, his resurrection and his bodily ascension to heaven. Though Christian masses continue to render lip service to these fictions, few thinkers even in Christian lands today believe in or dare assert the historic authenticity of these supposed events. There are not even prima facie considerations to sustain the theory of death upon the cross and there is no sure evidence to support the unnatural phenomena of the resurrection and the ascension.

Indeed the Gospels themselves furnish the most formidable refutations of these myths. The basic doctrine of the Church has been that Jesus being the son of God appeared in the human shape to take upon himself the accumulated burden of humanity’s sins and to expiate them on the Cross so that mankind might attain salvation through belief in the atonement. Being the son of God Himself and through his death upon the cross he became “accursed” for mankind’s sake and remained in that state for three days to atone for the sins of mankind. He, then, came back to life and ascended bodily to heaven. He will descend to the earth again in the latter days and judge mankind.

There is nothing in the authentic sayings and teachings of Jesus to support or justify any of this. According to him he was a prophet raised among Israel particularly for the guidance of the “lost sheep of the House of Israel.” (Matthew 15: 24). Were it true that he was the very God himself and that the sole purpose of his sojourn upon earth was to expiate mankind’s sins upon the cross, he would not have prayed in agony and asked his disciples to pray in the Garden of Gethsemane that if possible, the cup (of death upon the Cross) may be turned away (Matthew 26 : 39). Jesus believed that God heard his prayers. He must have believed that this prayer would also be heard. If the whole purpose of his advent was to atone for the sins of mankind through his death upon the cross why this agonized prayer to be spared such a death? This prayer is a complete refutation of the whole alleged purpose of his advent.

He must have received Divine assurance of deliverance in answer to his prayers (Hebrews 5:7). For, when, as a mortal being he perceived upon the cross that all apparent chance of his being delivered from his humiliating and agonizing demise upon the cross had disappeared, he was afflicted with the apprehension lest some default on his part should have defeated the Divine purpose of deliverance of which he had received assurance after his earnest prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane. This brought on fresh agony and he cried out “My God, my God! Why hast Thou forsaken me” ? ( Matthew 27: 46). If the death of Jesus upon the cross was the fulfillment of the very purpose for which he had been sent among mankind, the realization that death was now creeping upon him and that he was fast slipping into unconsciousness, should have filled him with a sense of exultation that he had now almost fulfilled the purpose of his advent, and that within a few hours that purpose would be completely achieved. Had that been so, his cry, instead of being one of agony and almost of despair, would have been a shout of exultation. He would have proclaimed, “Oh glory! Oh glory! the purpose is fulfilled. Mankind is redeemed through me,” instead of crying in anguish “My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken me.’

Had he died upon the cross and come back to life again, he would have proceeded to the highest vantage point in Jerusalem and proclaimed his triumph over death to the unbelieving Jews, and putting forward this irrefutable proof of his being the son of God, would have invited them to believe in him as such. He did not do this. Instead, he met the disciples a few times to convince them of the fact that he had not died upon the cross, had not become “accursed” and was still alive in his physical body (Matthew 28: 9, 10). He charged the disciples not to spread this news about him and he took precautions to meet them only in secret (Matthew 23: 19). There is not a single instance on record of any contemporary Jew or gentile having believed in him because he had died and had come to life, and yet had that been the case what greater miracle could anybody have desired to see? All this completely refutes the assertion that death upon the cross was the very purpose of his advent and that purpose had been fulfilled.

Jesus himself never taught this. He insisted that the way to salvation was through keeping “the law and the prophets.” Which Law? Obviously, the Mosaic Law. Which prophets ? Clearly the Prophets who had succeeded Moses in Israel. He reiterated that he had not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it. “Till heaven and earth pass, not one jot or title shall in no wise pass from the law.” (Matthew 5: 17, 18). He exhorted his disciples and followers to do what the Scribes and Pharisees told them to do, for they sat in Moses’ seat and were thus the authorized and traditional interpreters of the Law of Moses though he warned against imitation of their deeds for “they say and do not.” (Matthew 23: 2, 3).

The whole body of doctrine, based upon the Law being accursed and salvation being possible only through atonement, is a later innovation and finds no support whatever in anything that Jesus said or did. It is asserted that he described himself as the son of God, but this was clearly a metaphorical use of the expression common in sacred scriptures. When charged with this he turned upon his accusers saying that if those to whom the Word of God came were called God or even the first born of God, why should he be charged with blasphemy for using the very words. If they had the right to explain them metaphorically, why should this right be denied him.( John 10: 34, 35). The Bible describes Israel (Jacob) as God’s son, even the “first born”.'(Exodus 4:22). The peace-makers are described as the “Children of God” (Matthew 5: 9). In the Lord’s prayer God is addressed by the faithful as Father, the faithful being thus the sons of God. The Bible has frequently used this expression metaphorically to describe the chosen of God, the righteous people and even the whole of mankind.

Jesus had announced that his “wicked and adulterous” generation would be given no sign except the sign of the prophet Jonas.( Matthew 16: 4.). It is worth remembering that Jonas entered the belly of the whale alive, remained there alive, though unconscious, and emerged there from alive. So was Jesus taken down from the cross alive though unconscious, he remained in the sepulchre alive and emerged therefrom alive. Had he died upon the cross, there would have been no resemblance between his case and that of the Prophet Jonas, unless one were also to believe that Jonas too had died in the belly of the whale and had come back to life after he emerged there from, a theory which would scarcely be acceptable to the Church.( Jonah Chapter 2).

It is significant that the text of the Revised Standard Version (1946) of the New Testament, published by Thomas Nelson and Sons, New York, no longer makes mention of the bodily ascension of Jesus to heaven.

THE Muslims believe, as taught by the Holy Quran, that Jesus was a righteous Prophet raised by God among Israel. He himself emphasized that, and if the Jews rejected him the kingdom of heaven would pass to another people. Therefore, prophethood came to an end among Israel and the Comforter, the Spirit of Truth, was raised from among the descendants of Ishmael, that is to say, from among the brethren of Israel.”(Deutronomy 18: 18). He was the last Law-bearing Prophet and the Law proclaimed him in the Word of God, the Holy Quran, is “all truth” through which mankind has been guided, as proclaimed by Jesus. (John, 16: l3).

The earnest prayer of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, his agonized cry from the cross, the precautions taken by him when meeting his disciples after his recovery from the swoon into which he had been plunged upon the cross – are all consistent with the truth as taught by the Holy Quran. The prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane was inspired by the natural desire of Jesus to escape the humiliation and agony of death upon the cross. This desire was all the more keen as he realized that in case the Jews succeeded in compassing his death upon the cross, they would ever after claim, as they in fact do up to this day, that Jesus having died upon the cross became ‘accursed’ and could not, therefore, have been a righteous Prophet (Deuteronomy, 21: 23). Far from being anxious to become “accursed” for the sake of mankind, Jesus was most anxious to escape such a stigma, for the sake of his people, so that this should not become for them a permanent barrier against their acceptance of him as a righteous Prophet. The notion of becoming “accursed” even for a short period for the sake of mankind was so alien to his mind that he assured one of the two thieves who were put upon the cross at the same time with him that the latter would be with him in Paradise that very day. By that time Jesus, finding that there was no apparent way of escape left, was beginning to be somewhat reconciled to the prospect of death, if that was the inscrutable Will of God, though he still shrank from the dreadful consequence for the Jews, if he once became “accursed” in their eyes. He thus assured the thief that if both of them did cross the valley of the shadow of death that day, they would be together in paradise!” (Luke 23:43.)

Even at the very moment when the body of Jesus was about to be taken down from the cross to be handed over to Joseph of Arimathea and was pricked in the side (possibly in the region of the pleura) by a Roman soldier with his spear, blood and water came out, a sure testimony that life was not extinct. (John 19: 2332).

It may, therefore, be accepted as beyond controversy that Jesus did not die upon the cross. He was in a swoon when his body was taken down from the cross. He was lovingly tended and cared for and healing ointments and herbs were applied to his wounds from which he recovered sufficiently by the third day to be able to leave the sepuchre. Thereafter, he met his disciples on different occasions (there is a good deal of confusion with regard to this in the Gospel account) always taking precaution lest his presence among them and, therefore, his escape from death, should become known to his enemies. Having fully established testimony to his not having died upon the cross he resolved, under Divine Command, to leave Palestine and to journey through the lands where the lost tribes of Israel then dwelt so that he could carry the Divine message to them.

THUS Jesus completed his mission, died a natural death and was buried in Srinagar, Kashmir. Guided by Divine revelation and subsequent research, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement, located his tomb in the Khanyar Street of the city of Srinagar where it can still be visited. This discovery has dispelled any doubts as to the fact that Jesus did not die on the cross and has removed all uncertainty which had enshrouded the Life of Jesus for many centuries. May God rest his soul in peace and have mercy on him!

For further information & literature on the subject, please write to:

The London Mosque,
16 Gressenhall Road.
London, S.W.18.

More on this topic and download the books: Jesus – a humble prophet of God

Leave a Reply