Source: Wall Street Journal
By
Marci Hamilton
The First Amendment doesn’t exempt believers from general laws for the public good, especially when their conduct harms others
I was clerking for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 1990 when the Supreme Court decided Employment Division v. Smith—a case that has had an outsize effect on all subsequent debate over religious liberty in the U.S. Two drug counselors in Oregon had been fired after they used peyote, an illegal drug. They argued that because they used the peyote during a Native American Church service, the First Amendment’s guarantee of the “free exercise” of religion protected them from being penalized. The Supreme Court disagreed.
Share this:
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
Related
Categories: America, religious freedom, USA