Source: Huffington Post
By Jenavieve Hatch
The Democratic senator equated Omar’s words with extreme Islamophobia “that incites violence” a day after three leading presidential candidates defended Omar.
One day after three top Democratic presidential candidates defended Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) over charges of anti-Semitism, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) issued a noticeably different statement that seemed to admonish Omar, equating the congresswoman’s comments with a virulently Islamophobic poster displayed in the West Virginia Capitol that linked Omar to the Sept. 11 attacks.
“Those with critical views of Israel, such as Congresswoman Omar, should be able to express their views without employing anti-Semitic tropes about money or influence,” Gillibrand said in a statement on Tuesday. “Just as those critical of Congresswoman Omar should not be using Islamophobic language and imagery that incites violence, such as what we saw in West Virginia.”
Gillibrand acknowledged the hypocrisy of the Republican legislators who condemned Omar’s comments but “said little” after President Donald Trump defended white supremacists on multiple occasions.
“Both are unacceptable,” Gillibrand said. “As elected officials, we must be held to higher standards and we must all do better.”
Here are Gillibrand’s full remarks:
Speech that fuels hate and prejudice has no place in public discourse, whether it’s directed at Jews, Muslims, African Americans or other Americans. Those with critical views of Israel, such as Congresswoman Omar; should be able to express their views without employing anti-Semitic tropes about money or influence, just as those critical of Congresswoman Omar should not be using lslamophobic language and imagery that incites violence, such as what we saw in West Virginia.
We must also call out the hypocrisy of the Republican Party in this instance. Many Republicans have taken offense to Congresswoman Omar’s remarks and condemned her in the harshest terms, but said little or nothing when President Trump defended white supremacists at Charlottesville or when Leader McCarthy promoted a conspiracy about Jewish donors buying elections.
Both are unacceptable. As elected ofﬁcials, we must be held to a higher standard and we must all do better.
Omar came under fire on Friday after some interpreted her critical comments about Israel as anti-Semitic.
“I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” she said at an event on Feb. 28.
Gillibrand’s response to the controversy differed from those of her fellow presidential hopefuls, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), all of whom unequivocally threw their support behind the freshman congresswoman.
“Anti-Semitism is a hateful and dangerous ideology which must be vigorously opposed in the United States and around the world,” Sanders, who was first to speak out in support of Omar, said on Wednesday. “We must not, however, equate anti-Semitism with legitimate criticism of the right-wing, Netanyahu government in Israel.”
“We should be having a sound, respectful discussion about policy. You can both support Israel and be loyal to our country. I also believe there is a difference between criticism of policy or political leaders, and anti-Semitism,” Harris wrote.
“Branding criticism of Israel as automatically anti-Semitic has a chilling effect on our public discourse and makes it harder to achieve a peaceful solution between Israelis and Palestinians,” Warren stated.
Sanders, Harris and Warren all explicitly stated that criticism of Israel is not synonymous with anti-Semitism. Gillibrand made no such statement.