Source: Dawn.Com.
ISLAMABAD: Negotiations with Dr Tahirul Qadri were long and tedious but those who conducted them were firm on what they would concede and where they would adopt a tough stance.
Background interviews with the participants of Thursday’s talks reveal that the leaders of government-allied political parties had ensured that they were given a freehand in negotiations with Dr Qadri while assuring the government that they would give
away little to a man who had some unconstitutional demands in mind.
“Dr Sahib, if you want us to commit to a clear roadmap of general elections and changes in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), you will have to negotiate with the opposition PML-N,” a participant is said to have told the Allama when he pushed for an election date and made other demands.
The Muslim Times 
Dr Qadri has shown to the world that he can organise a peaceful march of thousands of people. Also there was no terrorist attack showed that all political parties one way or th other have their own terrorist or militan wing and thus they cause attacks. This also became obvious inspte of Malik Rahman’s threats nothing happened. So weldone Dr Qadri.
Well done Dr Qadri
Dr Qadri has shown to the world that he can organise a peaceful march of thousands of people. Also there was no terrorist attack showed that all political parties one way or the other that they have their own terrorist or militant wing or are associted with such group and thus they can cause attacks as and when required. This also became obvious inspite of Malik Rehman’s warning threats nothing happened. So well done Dr Qadri you have made it. I do not share any afilliation with Dr Qadri or his thoughts but do appreciate hat he has done rcently by awkening masses peacefully without breaking a Gamla as he declared.
Actually what the whole march proves is only that Dr. Qadri could ‘walk in Pakistan’ without being shot at – meaning that he should loose his asylum status and Canadian passport. May be he will argue however that he only survived because of his bullet-proof container, and thus retain asylum status?