Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern condemns Donald Trump’s attack on US congresswomen

New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern leaves after the Friday prayers at Hagley Park outside Al-Noor mosque in Christchurch

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern leaves after the Friday prayers at Hagley Park outside Al-Noor mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand March 22, 2019.

The Muslim Times is intellectually leading the way to refute Islamophobia and racism

Source: RNZ

 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has condemned comments made by the US President attacking four Democratic congresswomen and says she utterly disagrees with him.

Jacinda Ardern said people’s origins should not be judged. Photo: Supplied / Pool

US President Donald Trump has been accused of racism after posting tweets attacking Democratic congresswomen.

He claimed the women “originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe”, before suggesting they “go back”.

He then said Speaker “Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements”.

Read Further

Suggested reading

Nobel Prize for a noble woman

PM New Zealand: ‘The believers in their mutual kindness, compassion, and sympathy are just like one body’

Video: Prince William Draws Upon Princess Diana’s Death In Powerful Speech in New Zealand Mosque

8 replies

  1. jacinda is a moron, she does not eve understand politics. She just hears the medias leftist bias. The ‘four’ are racist and xenophobia is why trump called them out on it. fake news

    • Strange view again. Most of the world loves Jacinda. Many support her for a Nobel Prize. May I wonder whether may be you are the moron?

  2. because I am not influenced by fake western media. she is a fraud, bigot, sexist, hypocrite and tyrant. she is good actress for cameras and virtue signals. She allows all leftists speakers groups, media and conferences and shut down any other speech.

  3. who cares, the only one worth the nobel prize is the Trump. She has done nothing. To hell with trade negoiations if she had brains, she would see what globalism and trade does to nations. better to be poor and independant than , have the 5 per cent rich and the rest of population submissives.

    • well, speaking from experience, in relevant ‘new’ countries my personal opinion is that a benevolent dictator is better then so-called democracy. Pakistan under Field Marshall Ayub Khan for instance had its best time (I was there at the time). In Nigeria for instance in early days of military rule corruption was in a way limited to the military dictator. When ‘democracy’ arrived corruption increased, because during military rule only the ruler and his small circle of friends needed to benefit. When ‘democracy’ came all the members of parliament and ministers needed to make money in a hurry, as they did not know how long they will have their job. Just a thought. Yes, nothing is perfect. In Pakistan, when a civil servant did not take a bribe, people commented ‘he must be an Ahmadi’. Therefore that is the solution: the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam’at.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.