Sanctions hit humanitarian aid to Syria (or: if you starve a dog, so that he becomes more aggressive, you will be fined. Do the same to humans and it is ‘civilized’).

DAMASCUS, 25 January 2013 (IRIN) – Humanitarian and developmental aid agencies in Syria say international sanctions against the country have made their operations harder.

Last August, Italian NGO Terres des Hommes (TDH) sent its regular request for a financial transfer from Europe for its aid operation in Syria.

Then it waited. And waited. And waited.

After 15 days of delay, it contacted the bank in Italy, which informed the NGO that the transfer had been rejected.

“Receiving money from Europe to Syria is a disaster,” said Emanuela Rizzo, TDH country representative. The bank required a long list of documents, including the NGO’s agreement with the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, its memorandum of understanding with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, a letter vowing not to fund “terrorist” groups, and a list of implementing partners.

After two months and a 200 euro (US$267) administrative fee, TDH was able to get the money transferred through a different Italian bank with an affiliate in Syria. “But it’s becoming incredibly difficult,” Rizzo told IRIN.

Other aid agencies struggling to transfer money have resorted to wiring money to banks in Lebanon and physically driving across the border to pick it up. Aid coming in via social solidarity networks has had to do the same.

Since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011, the USA, European Union, Turkey and the League of Arab States, among others, have imposed a series of sanctions on Syria’s arms, banking, energy and oil sectors, as well as on specific individuals, with the stated aim of stopping state repression of protests, initially, and later, of weakening the government.

“Significant economic repercussions”

But as outlined in a 2012 report by the Danish Institute for International Studies “the sanctions regime has had significant economic repercussions beyond the Syrian state and government.”

Through “second-order effects”, like increased inflation, higher fuel and food prices, difficulty importing, higher unemployment, decreasing salary levels, and a fall in purchasing power, including access to food, “the sanctions add to the socioeconomic costs of the conflict and are likely to exacerbate pre-existing socioeconomic difficulties, particularly affecting the lower social strata of the population,” the report said.

While humanitarian aid is exempt from the sanctions, aid agencies say they – like most Syrians – have been affected indirectly. For example, sanctions have made it harder to find and more expensive to procure items for their operations.

Factories have struggled to import raw materials – a result of sanctions affecting bank transactions and contributing to a fast depreciation of the Syrian pound, but also of insecurity affecting supply lines. As such, many vendors that aid agencies used to rely on have shut down.

When the conflict began in March 2011 (shortly before the first round of sanctions in May 2011), the Syrian pound was trading at 47 to the dollar. Today, its value has depreciated to 76 at the official rate and 88 at the black market rate, which has at times surpassed 100.

Before the Syrian crisis, 26 factories producing nappies (diapers) and other hygiene products were registered with the Chamber of Commerce in Damascus. But when TDH put out a tender in October, only four were open and only one made a proposal. Even then, it could not provide the full quantity needed.

“For them, it was not feasible at all,” Rizzo said. As a result, four projects helping more than 4,000 people were delayed by two months.

“Prices have gone up so much,” added Louisa Seferis, emergency co-ordinator for the NGO Danish Refugee Council (DRC) in Syria.

She too is affected by a lack of availability: DRC used to be able to procure winter clothes from one factory in Aleppo that could produce 10,000 pieces a day. Now Seferis struggles to get 15,000 a week, split between several factories.

Other agencies have had to start importing items from abroad at a higher price and with a longer wait.

Trucking companies are now asking for more money to transport humanitarian goods as fuel shortages increase, prices rise and roads become more insecure, according to Radhouane Nouicer, regional humanitarian coordinator in Damascus.

Vendors are also less patient and pickier about payment.

“Procurement has become a real hurdle,” said one aid worker who preferred anonymity. “With every single vendor, their quote is valid for at best 10 days now. You have 10 days to complete the procurement and pay at the price they provide to you. Every vendor wants money right away. The transaction for us takes time. The people cannot wait for money as they could before.”

WFP operations affected

A severe fuel shortage has also forced the World Food Programme (WFP), which requires 12,000 litres of fuel per day for its operations, to negotiate with the government for permission – now in hand – to import fuel from abroad for humanitarian operations.

While much of its procurement of food was international to begin with, WFP has shifted even further towards international procurement as local prices have been rising, for two reasons: it became more cost-effective to buy internationally, and buying such large quantities locally would further drive up the price of food.

Most importantly, sanctions have increased humanitarian needs in the country, adding to the aid caseload, Nouicer said.

Many people can no longer afford their medicines or fuel to heat their homes. Others have lost their jobs and are now in need of assistance.

“Sanctions on the banking and energy sectors affect everybody in a country,” he said.


Categories: Arab World, Asia, Syria, United Nations

Tagged as:

1 reply

  1. ok, I wrote that: (or: if you starve a dog, so that he becomes more aggressive, you will be fined. Do the same to humans and it is ‘civilized’).

    I really believe that all those introducing sanctions, voting for sanctions, applying sanctions should be persecuted for war crimes. As said above, if you starve a dog purposely you will break the animal protection laws. By imposing sanctions you starve the whole country purposely and instead of being persecuted you sleep peacefully in your bed and think you did do a good thing ‘to get rid of a dictator’. Well, I can assure you just like Saddam Hussain and Col. Ghadafi never suffered any shortages so I am sure Bashar Assad is not standing in line for 6 to 12 hours to fill the tank of his car. By imposing sanctions you are putting hardship on the poorer sections of the country. Not only they will stand in line to buy fuel and bread, they loose their jobs and their whole livelihood. You think it will be ok when you send in the UN agencies to provide a little relief! Shame on all who promote and implement sanctions. If you do not get persecuted in this world may Allah give you your just reward in this world and the next.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.