Sep 24,2018 – JORDAN TIMES – JAMES J. ZOGBY
Seth Anziska’s “Preventing Palestine: A Political History from Camp David to Oslo” is a deeply insightful and profoundly disturbing book that traces the tortuous path of Middle East peacemaking during the past four decades. It was quite painful to read.
Having been a close observer, and sometimes participant, in many of the developments that have unfolded since the end of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Anziska opened old wounds while shedding new light on the painful events and acts of betrayal that have shaped recent Palestinian history.
Through all of the twists and turns of this period, the brutal wars and the diplomatic initiatives, the one constant that emerges is the Israeli determined refusal to recognise the Palestinian right to self-determination and statehood, and the self-serving acquiesce to their intransigence by successive American administrations and key Arab leaders.
The culprits are many. In Anziska’s telling of this history, we can find fault with most of the parties to the conflict, all of the US administrations that were involved during this period: Israeli prime ministers, whether from Labour or Likud, Egyptian presidents Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak, Lebanon’s Phalange Party and, in the end, even Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat.
Digging deep into the official records of the Israelis, Egyptians, Americans, Palestinians and others who participated in the region’s wars and various diplomatic endeavours, Anziska mines government and research centre archives, unearthing revealing contemporaneous accounts, minutes of meetings and official communiques, providing the story behind the story of events as they unfolded.
Especially fascinating were: The internal debates that took place in Israeli Cabinet meetings and how, at times, they would don a diplomatic mask of accommodation, while clinging to their firm refusal to surrender sovereignty of Palestinian lands or recognise the existence of a Palestinian nation, the discussions that occurred between president Jimmy Carter and his aides, the frustrations expressed by president Sadat’s various foreign ministers over his betrayal of the Palestinian cause, the way Israel’s Ariel Sharon rudely manhandled US emissaries and their cowering in the face of his belligerence, the way Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin initially sought to pose as the saviour of the Christians of Lebanon only to “turn on a dime” after they refused to sign a peace agreement on Israel’s terms, the insidious plotting of a Phalange leader with the Israelis to end the Palestinian presence in Lebanon and the short-lived, but still worth noting, instances of frustration of US presidents Carter and Ronald Reagan, and secretaries of state George Schultz and James Baker with the Israelis.
What emerges as key to the denial of Palestinian rights is the self-imposed paralysis of American decision makers in the face of Israeli intransigence, resulting from successive administration’s fears of the domestic political fallout that might follow any pressure the US might apply on Israel. Time and again, US principals grew impatient with Israeli ploys and their hardline refusal to recognise and grant national rights to the Palestinians, only to back down after advisers cautioned them of the political consequences that might result. There were no American “profiles in courage” emerging from Anziska’s book.
Carter, for example, began his term with a pledge to realise a “homeland” for the Palestinians. In line with his administration’s commitment to human rights, Carter was moved to end their suffering in exile and under occupation. The vehicle he envisioned to initiate the path toward this goal was an international all-party conference to end the Arab-Israeli conflict. Carter’s efforts were ultimately upended by a combination of: Israel’s refusal to participate in any forum that would question their claim of sovereignty over the Palestinian territories, Sadat’s resolve to achieve a separate Israeli-Egyptian peace without the Palestinians, despite his public pronouncements to the contrary and the pressure from the American Jewish community, which caused sufficient enough discomfort within the White House to cause Carter to back away from pressing Israel to cede land or political rights to the Palestinians.
In the end, Carter acceded to the pressure and sheparded the Camp David peace agreement between Israel and Egypt. The agreement, shaped largely by the Israelis, promised only future discussions on a vaguely worded plan for Palestinian “autonomy”, which in the Israeli lexicon meant that the Palestinians could realise control of their persons, but not control over land. The result, as Anziska notes was that at Camp David, Sadat got the Sinai and Begin got the West Bank. And with Israel’s southern border secured, Begin was free to attempt to “wipe out” the PLO in Lebanon.
Throughout the next four decades, the region witnessed the horrific Israeli invasion and occupation of Lebanon, together with the aerial bombardments that devastated Beirut and the massacres in the Palestinian refugee camps, two Palestinian uprisings and repeated failed American efforts at peacemaking.
During this time, the US dithered, professing to want to solve the conflict, but refusing to apply the pressure needed to make it happen. As Anziska observes, throughout this entire period, the Israelis, while agreeing to negotiate, insisted on their exclusive sovereignty over the occupied territories and their “God given right” to settle in them. These were not topics they would discuss. In communiques, they repeatedly chided their American interlocutors rejecting the designation “occupied territories” and insisting on the terms “Judea and Samaria”. They also rejected the term “Palestinian people”, referring to them, instead, as “Arab inhabitants”.
As a result of this, Israeli intransigence and the weak-kneed American response, the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian lands only deepened. In 1977, there were about 5,000-8,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, by 1992 there were 100,000 settlers and today the number exceeds 600,000.
Despite the euphoria that accompanied the September 1993 signing of the Oslo Accords, Anziska demonstrates the similarities between what Oslo provided for the Palestinians and the autonomy proposal offered by Begin at Camp David 15 years earlier. The supposed self-rule won by the Palestinians at Oslo was circumscribed by Israel’s insistence that it retains control over land, resources, security and borders. Like Begin’s proposal at Camp David, there would be no Palestinian sovereignty and no truly independent state. Anziska cites many prominent Palestinians who called Arafat to task for his rush to sign what they termed a “flawed agreement”.
Begin, while adamantly rejecting a Palestinian state, at times, spoke magnanimously of extending rights to the “Arab inhabitants in Judea and Samaria”, whom he saw as a “minority” living in Eretz Israel. Anziska quotes Begin saying, “What’s wrong with a Jewish majority living together with an Arab minority in peace, in human dignity, in equality of rights?”
Well, here we are in 2018, 40 years after Camp David. The Palestinian dream of an independent state is not only unrealised but is most likely unrealisable. With many Palestinians now favouring a one state solution, they may throw Begin’s words back at him and say, “There is nothing wrong with that!” The problem for the Israelis, of course, is that the once “Arab minority” is now a majority and Israelis have only themselves to thank for digging this hole. By “preventing Palestine”, they have given birth to a new reality.
The writer is president of the Washington-based Arab American Institute