Trump to cut millions from UN agency for Palestinian refugees – officials

US officials say only $60m of $125m for UN Relief and Works Agency likely as compromise between Mattis and Tillerson and hardline UN ambassador Haley

A woman arrives at a UN compound in the Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus.

The Trump administration is preparing to withhold tens of millions of dollars from the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, cutting the year’s first contribution by more than half or perhaps entirely and making additional donations contingent on major changes to the organization, US officials said.

Donald Trump has not made a final decision but appears more likely to send only $60m of a planned $125m first installment to the UN Relief and Works Agency, said the officials, who were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

Future contributions would require the agency, which faces heavy criticism from Israel, to demonstrate significant changes in operations, the officials said, adding that one suggestion under consideration would require the Palestinians to re-enter peace talks with Israel.

The state department said on Sunday that “the decision is under review. There are still deliberations taking place.”

The White House did not immediately respond to questions about the matter.

The administration could announce its decision as early as Tuesday, the officials said. The plan to withhold some money is backed by the secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, and defense secretary, James Mattis, who offered it as a compromise to demands for more drastic measures by the UN ambassador, Nikki Haley, the officials said.

Haley wants a complete cutoff in US money until the Palestinians resume peace talks that have been frozen for years. But Tillerson, Mattis and others say ending all assistance would exacerbate instability in the Middle East, notably in Jordan, a host to hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees and a crucial US strategic partner.

The US is the agency’s largest donor, supplying nearly 30% of its total budget. The agency focuses on providing healthcare, education and social services to Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians either fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to the establishment of Israel in 1948. Today, there are an estimated 5 million refugees and their descendants, scattered across the region.

Eliminating or sharply reducing US aid could hamstring the UN agency, putting great pressure on Jordan and Lebanon as well as the Palestinian Authority. Gaza would be particularly hard hit. Some officials, including Israelis, warn that it might push people closer to the militant Hamas movement, which controls Gaza.

The US officials said any reduction in assistance could be accompanied by calls for European nations and others to help make up the shortfall.

The US donated $355m in 2016 and was set to make a similar contribution this year. But after a highly critical 2 January tweet from Trump on aid to the Palestinians, the state department opted to wait for a formal policy decision before sending any of the first $125m.

Categories: Americas, Asia, United States

Tagged as: , ,

2 replies

  1. It is important to reflect a moment WHY the USA was paying so much for this agency. Whose responsibility are civilians in occupied territories? Of course the occupation forces = Israel. And who is happy to pay Israel’s bills: the USA of course. This fact of life may escape dear President Trump as he does not read and does not know the laws nor the history. But we, the readers of The Muslim Times do. – That said I always felt that instead of continuing to pay the Palestinians bills only over decades this UN agency should have done something so that paying these bills was no longer necessary. Like stopping the blockade of Gaza for instance. Permitting free economic development in the occupied territories without the need of Israeli permits at every corner. – And now? Yes, Israel should pay its bills of occupation ! (why did I not read such opinions in the main media? yet?)

Leave a Reply