Is the international order capable of meeting the enormous challenges facing states and societies around the world? We look at the four main challenges facing International Geneva. 
This content was published on January 13, 2021
Frédéric Burnand
Andreas Gefe (Illustration)
As the European headquarters of the United Nations, Geneva helped mark in 2020 the 75th anniversary of the founding of the UN and 100 years since the formation of the League of Nations (LoN). Geneva is one of the two most important global centres of multilateral diplomacy together with New York. In Geneva, the challenges facing the entire planet are debated and negotiated before being sent to New York, where the states decide which options to respond to.
This organisational model for relations between states is more precious than ever; the Geneva authorities named the celebrations #Multilateralism100. It is an unequivocal call for action at a time when the world’s policeman – the United States – was still sliding towards unilateralism, a desire for power without regard for the sovereignty of other states or for international law that governs relations.
The challenge of peace
Peace: This was the raison d’être for the creation of the LoN, as it is for the UN, two organisations born from the ashes of two world wars that ravaged Europe and Asia. Each time, the victors of these two international conflicts wanted to establish a judicial framework based on man’s right to self-determination. The aim was to ensure that peace would not rest solely on the balance of power between the major powers but would take account of the interests of all member states and their citizens.
It is an objective which is far from being achieved, according to UN secretary general Antonio Guterres.
“Today, a wind of madness is sweeping the globe. From Libya to Yemen to Syria and beyond – escalation is back. Arms are flowing. Offensives are increasing. […] Meanwhile, Security Council resolutions are being disrespected before the ink is even dry,” warned Guterres on February 4, 2020.
So, in terms of collective security, is the UN on the verge of becoming obsolete, as happened to the LoN at the end of the 1930s?
If the UN’s executive branch – the Security Council – is paralysed, other international bodies help pacify societies. The UN is based on three pillars: peace and security, development and human rights. As pointed out by the late former UN secretary general Kofi Annan in 2005, these three areas are interdependent.
“There cannot be security without development nor development without security. And one and the other each depend on the respect of human rights and the state of law,” Annan said.
But for at least a decade, civil liberties have been eroded even at the heart of liberal democracies such as the US, but also in Europe.
At the same time, authoritarian regimes like China are taking advantage of western weaknesses to tout an alternative model of economic success that excludes complete respect for civil and political rights. The heart of modern democratic regimes, human rights, are being questioned even within the international bodies that are supposed to defend them.
The backsliding of democracies could influence the way the world responds to the two major issues of the 21st century: the climate and environmental crisis, and the digital transition of the economy and of society.
The health challenge
The coronavirus SRAS-CoV-2 pandemic is the black swan – the unpredictable event shaking the world. With the World Health Organization (WHO) on the frontline, the UN can demonstrate the importance of its role as a coordinator of international health and national policies.
The pandemic which surprised many states was extremely predictable. Following epidemics like Aids in the 1980s and SARS in 2002, WHO member states revised international health regulations in 2005 to assist countries to work together to contain such viruses.
s.
However, as this international instrument has not been properly applied, coronavirus has spread worldwide. It remains to be seen whether the shock of Covid-19 and its multiple consequences will give the UN a new legitimacy or render it meaningless, like the League of Nations a century ago.
The environmental challenge
In relation to the climate, Guterres reiterated that there can only be collective solutions which engage all UN member states. Could this existential threat to humanity as a whole cause the international community to split, as happened in the wake of the two world wars last century?
At the same time, the world is engaged in an industrial revolution that is larger and more profound than those which took place in the 19th and 20th centuries. The digital transition is radically transforming the economic and financial world, as well as the functioning of societies and the democratic rights designed to govern them. The individual and collective rights contained in the UN Charter are therefore under serious threat.
Articles in this story
Geneva, a global centre for multilateralism and diplomacy
Geneva’s long-running diplomatic ballet
Trump jitters cast shadow over close US-Geneva ties
With Geneva, Switzerland strode boldly into the 20th century
Can countries keep up with the spread of Covid-19?
Has the global labour organisation advanced workers’ rights?
Tags: POLITICSLAW AND ORDERENVIRONMENT
Categories: Europe, Europe and Australia, Switzerland, United Nations
We have to analyze this question in two parts: The political side of the UN and the Humanitarian side of the UN.
In the political side of the UN the UN Security Council is dominating. With the veto rights of the victor nations of the second world war the whole system is totally out of date. If they cannot reform than it then it has to close down.
Just my opinion.
Just make sure my UN pension keeps being paid. But that is another problem. When I joined the International Organization for Migration one dollar was 1.78 Swiss Francs. Now that I am receiving my penson in dollars one dollar is 0.89 Swiss Francs. ok, no further comments.