Emmanuel Macron’s War on Islamism Is Europe’s Future

_89925705_cyclist_eiffel_getty976

Eiffel Tower the most famous landmark of France.  The Muslim Times is promoting human rights, women rights, interfaith tolerance and secularism in every country of the world 

Source: FP

The French president’s recent speech is a sign that moderate leaders are waking up to the threat posed by political Islam.

By Lorenzo Vidino | February 24, 2020, 5:00 PM

The Mulhouse speech, and its harsh language, came as no surprise to anybody who has followed the French debate on Islamism over the last few years. Terms such as “Islamist separatism,” “communitarianism,” and “Islamist supremacism”—which in previous years constituted the vocabulary almost exclusively of the National Front (now National Rally, Marine Le Pen’s far-right party)—have become ubiquitous.

The term “fréro-salafiste” has also become mainstream. It covers the two Islamist trends critics accuse of promoting separatism in the country: the Muslim Brotherhood (Fréres musulmans in French), with its moderate façade but divisive agenda, and the Salafists, with their firm rejection of French society.

“We are talking,” Macron said in another speech last April, “about a secession that is sometimes insidiously installed because the Republic has deserted or has not kept its promises. We are talking about people who, in the name of a religion, are pursuing a political project, that of a political Islam that wants to secede from our Republic.”

The trigger for France’s heightened concerns about Islamism has unquestionably been terrorism.

The trigger for France’s heightened concerns about Islamism has unquestionably been terrorism.

Since the Charlie Hebdo attacks in January 2015, in fact, the country has been in an almost constant state of alert. It has experienced massive attacks, like the November 2015 Paris attacks and the July 2016 Nice truck ramming, and an almost monthly slew of low-intensity acts of violence often perpetrated by individuals linked to or simply inspired by the Islamic State. It is also the European country with the dubious honor of having contributed the largest contingent of foreign fighters in Syria—some 2,000.

The assessment among many experts inside and outside the government is that the “lost territories of the Republic,” as areas where government control is weak and where crime and Islamism thrive have come to be referred to in some quarters, were the perfect breeding grounds for this phenomenon. Two recent books by Hugo Micheron and Bernard Rougier, which have received huge coverage, have clearly shown that while marginalization, crime, and unemployment were important factors in causing France’s radicalization wave, even more crucial was the separatist environment created by the so-called fréro-salafistes. In substance, they argue, nonviolent Islamists provide a conducive ecosystem that aids the recruitment efforts of jihadi groups—a position, to be sure, that is not universally accepted.

But France’s concerns about Islamism go well beyond terrorism. Critics argue that nonviolent Islamist groups, wh­ile largely operating within the boundaries of the law, propagate an interpretation of Islam that drives a wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims, contributing to polarization and harming integration. Europeans are concerned about the growing sway of Islamist groups that seek to push members of local Muslim communities to detach from mainstream society—mostly through preaching but also through various forms of social pressure, intimidation and, occasionally, violence— and resort to alternative legal, educational, and social systems.

“In the Republic,” Macron said in Mulhouse, “we cannot accept that we refuse to shake hands with a woman because she is a woman. In the Republic, we cannot accept that someone refuses to be treated or educated by someone because she is a woman. In the Republic, one cannot accept school dropouts for religious or belief reasons. In the Republic, one cannot require certificates of virginity to marry.”

Macron is a staunch foe of populism, but he is also a good reader of his nation’s collective psyche.

That Macron, a staunch foe of populism but, at the same time, a good reader of his nation’s collective psyche, would highlight the negative impact of Islamism on French society is also indicative of a trend that can be observed throughout Europe. The debate on nonviolent Islamism has often taken a back seat to that on the violent manifestations of the ideology.

read more here:

shah_zia

Dr. Zia H Shah, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times

Suggested reading by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times, for secularism in every country

What Every Muslim, Christian and Jew needs to know: The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath

The Prophet’s Greatest Victory According to the Quran: A Peace Treaty

Eating Beef in India; Another Reason Why World Needs Secularism in Our Global Village

In Defense of the Secular Narrative of the Holy Quran

Eating Beef in India; Another Reason Why World Needs Secularism in Our Global Village

Why Secularism Is Compatible with the Quran and Sunnah — And an ‘Islamic State’ Is Not

The Muslim Times has the best collection of articles promoting secularism in every country of the world

Book Review: Muslims Learning Secularism from Jesus Son of Mary

CNN Documentary: Ultra-orthodox Jews and Israel’s Struggle with Secularism

Why Did Muhammad Fly to Jerusalem?

How can we build the Third Temple together?

The Hypocrisy of Quebec’s MNAs on Full Display in the Crucifix in the Parliament Building

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Delivers Sharp Dissent In Supreme Court Cross Case

7 replies

  1. Dose Ahmadiyyah agree with religious renewal?

    Al-Azhar, the highest seat of Sunni Islamic learning, organised the late-January conference in Cairo to discuss urgent issues on the religious stage and religious renewal. Delegates and scholars from 46 countries were invited to the Al-Azhar International Conference on Reno

    I urge Ahmadiyyah to change or reform Islamic teaching!

    • I love Ahmadiyyah not only supporting the secularism— but also supporting for change the old Islamic law and delete all verses of calling for kulling and punishment Jews, Christian and unbeliever.

      If Ahmadiyyah can do it Ahmadiyyah will be greater.

      • As long as the verses that colling for killing and punishing Jews, Christian and Unbeliever — the bad Muslim will use tha violent verses and Hadith— that is the root of Problem ! Rafiq!

      • Alhamdolillah. Ahmadiyyat is doing a great job with http://www.mta.tv and all its websites. Unfortunately Somi does not seem to watch MTA TV because he blindly repeats his own mantra and does not appreciate all the teaching that our people are doing throughout the world with all means.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.