From ISRAEL HAYOM: The history of nonagression pacts in Islam (as seen by this author)

dome_of_the_rock__temple_mount_02

Dome of the Rock and Temple Mount in Jerusalem

By Harold Rhode, who received in PhD in Ottoman history and later served as the Turkish Desk Officer at the US Department of Defense. He is now a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.

Does it matter that Muslim Arabs cannot sign a true peace agreement with Israel? Not as long as Israel recognizes it must remain militarily strong and resolute in defending its culture and borders.

The news media is filled with reports that the Arab world – most notably Saudi Arabia and countries in the Persian Gulf, might be prepared to sign a nonaggression pact with Israel. What does this mean, however, from a Muslim perspective?

For countries with strong institutions, agreements are not made between leaders. Meaning that such agreements continue to be valid even if the countries’ governments change.
This is not the case in the Middle East, where with the possible exception of Turkey, agreements are made between leaders, and last as long as those leaders are still in power.

Middle Eastern states are by their very nature authoritarian, even if they appear to have the trappings of democracy – like parliaments, government ministers, etc. If a leader dies or is overthrown, all bets are off. The new leader decides which agreements he will honor.

In essence, in these authoritarian states institutions are by their nature weak, because they are loyal and respond to the leader – not to the people. Regarding Middle Eastern leaders, the late professor Bernard Lewis used to say “the state is their estate.” Meaning that they understand their countries to be their fiefdoms, where they can do pretty much what they want.

In summary, in democratic societies, a “government official” means a person who represents the people vis-à-vis the government. The people empower their governments.

In the Middle East, the Arabic/Turkish/Persian word for government official/bureaucrat is “maamur” or “mu’azif” – which mean “one who is commanded.” But commanded by whom? Answer: Middle Eastern government officials don’t work for the people, they work for and represent the rulers – i.e. a top-down structure.

In Islam, peace as we know it in the West, meaning letting bygones be bygones, cannot exist between Muslims and non-Muslims. According to both the Koran and the Shari’a, there can however be a temporary agreement – a truce or armistice. Such a truce is called a “sulha” or “hudna.” These agreements are modeled after the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, a 628 CE treaty between the Islamic prophet Mohammad and the Quraysh tribe of Mecca, who Mohammad was unable to defeat.

The agreement was to last 10 years, but after only two – when Mohammad had managed to rearm himself sufficiently – he reneged on the agreement, attacked his enemies, and defeated them.

This sulha/hudna agreement is the type of non-aggression pact the Saudis and other Arab Muslim nations seem to be willing to sign with Israel. It is now in their interest to do so because their existential enemy is Iran, an enemy which they share with Israel.

Any agreement they sign with the Israelis must be understood in these terms. These are not peace agreements; they remain in force only as long as the leaders of these Arab countries believe it in their interest.

What would happen, for example, if the Iranian regime collapsed and the new government in Iran no longer threatened the Sunni Arab regimes? Would Israel and these Arab countries still share common interests? Would these agreements still hold? Can Muslim leaders recognize Israel as a Jewish state with the right to live within borders on land once conquered by Muslims?

Read further

Suggested reading by Zia H Shah MD, Chief Editor of the Muslim Times, for the best understanding of universal brotherhood and what is and what is not anti-Semitism and to promote universal brotherhood

Prince Charles calls for ‘freedom, justice, equality’ for Palestinians during Bethlehem visit

The Muslim Times Leading the Way to Interfaith Tolerance Among Abrahamic Faiths

BBC Video: The Big Questions: Is anti-Zionism anti-Semitic

As an Israeli American, I agree with Ilhan Omar much more than the US politicians weaponising antisemitism

Debunking the myth that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitic

Bernie Sanders Hires First-Ever Muslim Presidential Campaign Manager

The Muslim Times’ Collection to Show, Islam or the Holy Quran are Not Anti-Semitic

CNN Documentary: Ultra-orthodox Jews and Israel’s Struggle with Secularism

Why Did Muhammad Fly to Jerusalem?

How can we build the Third Temple together?

True Fasting: A Message of Compassion and Love from the Old Testament

President Jimmy Carter: Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid

Kripkean Dogmatism: The Best Metaphor to Understand Religious and Political Debates

7 replies

  1. We wanted to give you ‘the other side of the story’, just so that the reader has a full picture.

    The author talks about a thoughtrevolution on the Arab side. What about a thoughtrevolution on the Israeli side? So that the Israelis would accept all citizens, whether Arab or Jewish, whether Muslim, Christian, Druzes or Jews as equal? I am waiting for that thoughtrevolution.

    • Aren’t the Druze living in peace in Israel’s north?
      Aren’t there Muslims, Christians, and Jews working in Israel’s government.
      Isn’t Tel Aviv a good example of a city which shares this excepting sentiment you speak of…even to the extent where LGBTQ’s 🏳️‍🌈 can freely express themselves openly (something I witnessed first hand) unlike ANY other state/nation in the Middle East?

      • If that is so why not extend the same curtesy of equal citizenship to all the occupied territories? Where you have made a state impossible with your settlements?

    • It has happened. Majority of Jews 66% if not more feel that way.
      It is not the fault of Jews that Muslim Palestinians hate Jews with a demonic passion.
      Salam
      Sam

      • I do not think any Muslims hate Jews with a demonic passion. It is the Israelis who took their land. Understandable in a way. I think we should continue to make the distinction between hating or not Jews and hating or not Israelis. After all, Muslims men are even permitted to marry Jewish ladies (and therefore love them)… just saying…

  2. You do not give an inch! Close to a million Jews were thrown out of Arabia. Israel was Jewish before it was Muslim. Most Palestinians forefathers were from Egypt and Syria.
    They could of had a state in 1948.
    The way they carry on now mark my words they will go the way of the Red Indians of America!
    Give a little or there is no sense in chatting!
    Salam
    Sam

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.